CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 10, 2026

Understanding and Improving Model Editing for Secure Code Generation

arXiv Security Archived Aug 10, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.06848v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for code generation, yet they can reproduce vulnerable implementations learned from insecure training patterns. Prior work has mainly explored inference-time hardening, which reduces insecure generations without modifying the target model but relies on auxiliary components and adds runtime overhead. We conduct the first systematic study of model editing as a model-level hardening mechanism for secure cod

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 7 Aug 2026] Understanding and Improving Model Editing for Secure Code Generation Weifeng Sun, Quanjun Zhang, Yuchen Chen, Chengran Yang, Gou Tan, David Lo Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for code generation, yet they can reproduce vulnerable implementations learned from insecure training patterns. Prior work has mainly explored inference-time hardening, which reduces insecure generations without modifying the target model but relies on auxiliary components and adds runtime overhead. We conduct the first systematic study of model editing as a model-level hardening mechanism for secure code generation. We evaluate 3 state-of-the-art editing methods across diverse LLM families and compare them with CoSec, a representative inference-time approach, focusing on security, robustness, generalization, and functional correctness. Model editing yields larger security gains than CoSec on seen vulnerability types, improving security ratios by 15%-25% over vanilla models, with gains remaining stable under prompt perturbations. However, these improvements transfer unreliably to unseen vulnerabilities and can reduce functional correctness. To mitigate this trade-off, we propose SafeEdit, a post-edit refinement method combining functional tuning with edit-aware regularization. Across eight target LLMs, SafeEdit improves Pass@1 over UltraEdit by 11.73/13.70/15.50 percentage points at T=0.1/0.4/0.8 while largely preserving security. Compared with CoSec, it achieves relative security-ratio gains of 7.54%-12.04%. Additional evaluation on CodeGuard+ confirms improved joint secure-and-correct generation. SafeEdit and CoSec are also complementary, and their combination can further improve security while maintaining strong functional correctness. Overall, our results provide evidence-backed guidance for applying model editing to secure code generation. Comments: ISSTA 2026 Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2608.06848 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2608.06848v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06848 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Weifeng Sun [view email] [v1] Fri, 7 Aug 2026 06:16:38 UTC (768 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 10, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 10, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗