From Documentation to Zero-day Vulnerabilities: LLM-Driven Fuzzing of JavaScript Engines in PDF Readers
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 10, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.06641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing fuzzers for PDF readers rely on simple test cases that involve only individual API calls, leading to limited coverage and potentially missing vulnerabilities that require sequences of API calls. To address these limitations, we propose PDFuzzer, a novel PDF engine fuzzer that automatically generates complex and meaningful API call sequences. PDFuzzer first uses a Large Language Model (LLM) to construct context-free grammars and infer the r
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]
From Documentation to Zero-day Vulnerabilities: LLM-Driven Fuzzing of JavaScript Engines in PDF Readers
Suyue Guo, Stijn Pletinckx, Tianle Yu, Yigitcan Kaya, Saad Ullah, Wenbo Guo, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna
Existing fuzzers for PDF readers rely on simple test cases that involve only individual API calls, leading to limited coverage and potentially missing vulnerabilities that require sequences of API calls. To address these limitations, we propose PDFuzzer, a novel PDF engine fuzzer that automatically generates complex and meaningful API call sequences. PDFuzzer first uses a Large Language Model (LLM) to construct context-free grammars and infer the relationships between individual API calls from specifications extracted from JavaScript API manuals and execution traces. Based on the grammars and relationships, PDFuzzer employs a constraint solver to generate concrete API call sequences for fuzzing. Our experiments show that PDFuzzer significantly outperforms state-of-the-art PDF fuzzers (TypeOracle, Favocado, and Cooper) and LLM-based fuzzers (Fuzz4All, naive LLM) on three mainstream PDF readers: Adobe Acrobat Reader, Foxit PDF Reader, and PDF-XChange Editor. PDFuzzer achieves up to 48% higher coverage than existing tools and identifies 31 zero-day vulnerabilities in these readers, from information leakage to arbitrary code execution. Our ablation study validates the necessity of each component, including LLMs, which achieve high accuracy across all pipeline stages (93-98%). We disclosed all vulnerabilities to the vendors via a coordinated vulnerability disclosure process and received bug bounties.
Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures, accepted by ACM CCS 2026
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.06641 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.06641v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06641
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Suyue Guo [view email]
[v1] Thu, 6 Aug 2026 23:15:56 UTC (357 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SE
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)