CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 20, 2026

Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Security Incident Analysis

arXiv Security Archived Mar 20, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.18196v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Investigating cybersecurity incidents requires collecting and analyzing evidence from multiple log sources, including intrusion detection alerts, network traffic records, and authentication events. This process is labor-intensive: analysts must sift through large volumes of data to identify relevant indicators and piece together what happened. We present a RAG-based system that performs security incident analysis through targeted query-based filter

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 18 Mar 2026] Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Security Incident Analysis Xavier Cadet, Aditya Vikram Singh, Harsh Mamania, Edward Koh, Alex Fitts, Dirk Van Bruggen, Simona Boboila, Peter Chin, Alina Oprea Investigating cybersecurity incidents requires collecting and analyzing evidence from multiple log sources, including intrusion detection alerts, network traffic records, and authentication events. This process is labor-intensive: analysts must sift through large volumes of data to identify relevant indicators and piece together what happened. We present a RAG-based system that performs security incident analysis through targeted query-based filtering and LLM semantic reasoning. The system uses a query library with associated MITRE ATT\&CK techniques to extract indicators from raw logs, then retrieves relevant context to answer forensic questions and reconstruct attack sequences. We evaluate the system with five LLM providers on malware traffic incidents and multi-stage Active Directory attacks. We find that LLM models have different performance and tradeoffs, with Claude Sonnet~4 and DeepSeek~V3 achieving 100\% recall across all four malware scenarios, while DeepSeek costs 15\times less ($0.008 vs.\ $0.12 per analysis). Attack step detection on Active Directory scenarios reaches 100\% precision and 82\% recall. Ablation studies confirm that a RAG architecture is essential: LLM baselines without RAG-enhanced context correctly identify victim hosts but miss all attack infrastructure including malicious domains and command-and-control servers. These results demonstrate that combining targeted query-based filtering with RAG-based retrieval enables accurate, cost-effective security analysis within LLM context limits. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.18196 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2603.18196v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18196 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Simona Boboila [view email] [v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 18:45:56 UTC (63 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 20, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 20, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗