MMAligner: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models through Representation Calibration
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.05909v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often refuse unsafe text prompts yet generate harmful responses to semantically equivalent multimodal inputs. Existing defenses either rely on external guardrails, which add inference overhead without repairing intrinsic flaws, or safety fine-tuning, which treats alignment as black-box optimization and may sacrifice utility or require large multimodal datasets. To identify the cause of this safety disparity,
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]
MMAligner: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models through Representation Calibration
Shenyi Zhang, Keyan Guo, Zihao Wang, Xuebin Li, Lingchen Zhao, Hongxin Hu, Chao Shen, Qian Wang
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often refuse unsafe text prompts yet generate harmful responses to semantically equivalent multimodal inputs. Existing defenses either rely on external guardrails, which add inference overhead without repairing intrinsic flaws, or safety fine-tuning, which treats alignment as black-box optimization and may sacrifice utility or require large multimodal datasets. To identify the cause of this safety disparity, we analyze MLLM representations geometrically. We find that safety mechanisms learned from text persist across modalities: a shared safety subspace and refusal boundary remain effective, and representations inside this boundary consistently trigger refusals. However, unsafe multimodal inputs undergo a representation shift that places most of them outside the boundary, allowing them to bypass the model's intrinsic safety mechanism. This indicates that multimodal safety degradation stems from representation misalignment rather than the absence of safety capability. Based on this finding, we propose MMAligner, a safeguarding method that calibrates unsafe multimodal representations into the pre-existing refusal region. MMAligner applies a hard lower bound to ensure refusal, a soft upper bound to avoid excessive modification, and a preservation objective for benign inputs. Experiments across multiple open-source MLLMs show that MMAligner raises the average refusal rate on unsafe multimodal inputs to 99% with less than 2% utility degradation and minimal training data, substantially improving the safety-utility trade-off over existing baselines. (*Due to the notification from arXiv, "The Abstract field cannot be longer than 1,920 characters", the Abstract that appeared is shortened.)
Comments: To Appear in the Proceedings of The ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 2026
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.05909 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.05909v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05909
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Shenyi Zhang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 6 Aug 2026 11:39:08 UTC (1,505 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)