On the Figures of Merit for Quantum Software Security: Toward a Benchmarking Rubric
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.05831v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum software is increasingly provided through multi-tenant and cloud-based Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) stacks. A growing concern about the diverse attack vectors across the pipeline has been demonstrated in recent research. Yet the community has converged on three mature pillars: Scale (Qubit Count), Quality (Quantum Volume), and Speed (Circuit Layer Operations per Second (CLOPS)) for the merit performance figures. Moreover, it has also begun t
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]
On the Figures of Merit for Quantum Software Security: Toward a Benchmarking Rubric
Badhon Rahman, Majid Haghparast, Tommi Mikkonen
Quantum software is increasingly provided through multi-tenant and cloud-based Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) stacks. A growing concern about the diverse attack vectors across the pipeline has been demonstrated in recent research. Yet the community has converged on three mature pillars: Scale (Qubit Count), Quality (Quantum Volume), and Speed (Circuit Layer Operations per Second (CLOPS)) for the merit performance figures. Moreover, it has also begun to define software-quality metrics. However, the security of quantum software remains largely unmeasured. A few quantitative security indicators, such as Total Variation Distance (TVD) and Degree of Functional Corruption (DFC), exist. Although they were introduced ad hoc for individual circuit obfuscation techniques, they are incompatible. We assert that the security of quantum software deserves the same attention as the performance: an explicit set of Security Figures of Merit (S-FoMs). The research of this paper is threefold: (i) characterizes a three-layer measurement gap, (ii) proposes a structured S-FoM set organized by ISO/IEC 25010 security sub-characteristics, QaaS pipeline mapping, and measurement maturity, and (iii) defines a benchmarking rubric that normalizes and aggregates S-FoMs into a combined Quantum Software Security Posture (QSSP) score. Additionally, an illustrative reanalysis of published obfuscation techniques has been presented. Our aim is a first step toward security-aware benchmarking of the Quantum Software Stack (QSS).
Comments: 4 pages, 1 figure. Accepted at the 6th International Workshop on Quantum Software Engineering and Technology (Q-SET 2026), co-located with IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing & Engineering (QCE26)
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.05831 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.05831v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05831
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Badhon Rahman [view email]
[v1] Thu, 6 Aug 2026 09:59:49 UTC (11 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)