Leak-Resistant Unlearning: A New Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning Consistency and Recovery Robustness
arXiv AIArchived Aug 06, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.04519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarking machine unlearning methods is critical to understand whether sensitive knowledge is removed from large language models (LLMs) or not. Current unlearning benchmarks include mainly single-hop questions and a narrow set of multi-hop questions. Although effective, they still face two challenges. (1) Knowledge is not isolated, whereby diverse multi-hop reasoning paths can potentially induce knowledge leakage than normal queries. (2) Unlearn
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 5 Aug 2026]
Leak-Resistant Unlearning: A New Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning Consistency and Recovery Robustness
Haoting Qian, Qingjie Zhang, Zhicong Huang, Cheng Hong, Han Qiu
Benchmarking machine unlearning methods is critical to understand whether sensitive knowledge is removed from large language models (LLMs) or not. Current unlearning benchmarks include mainly single-hop questions and a narrow set of multi-hop questions. Although effective, they still face two challenges. (1) Knowledge is not isolated, whereby diverse multi-hop reasoning paths can potentially induce knowledge leakage than normal queries. (2) Unlearning may be fragile: unlearned knowledge can be partially recovered through recovery attacks such as lightweight post-unlearning adaptation, making static evaluation insufficient. Therefore, in this paper, we introduce \unlearning as a novel benchmark to understand robust LLM knowledge removal across diverse reasoning paths and recovery attacks. We experiment with this benchmark on 3 models, 6 unlearning methods, and 2 carefully curated datasets. Results show that existing methods are vulnerable to multi-hop reasoning paths and recovery attacks. We further explore the trade-off among forget quality, robustness, and model utility for LLM unlearning.
Comments: 19 pages, 7 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.04519 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.04519v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04519
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Haoting Qian [view email]
[v1] Wed, 5 Aug 2026 06:53:20 UTC (1,382 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)