Interoceptive Attention as Dynamic Homeostatic Prioritization in a Foraging Agent
arXiv AIArchived Aug 06, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.04232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Biological systems must regulate competing needs under limited perceptual bandwidth, where sharpening one estimate costs the capacity to sharpen the others. Any fixed-budget system therefore has to decide where to allocate its perceptual precision. We study this in a foraging agent that must keep several bodily needs satisfied to survive, modelled with active inference. At each step it reads its own body-state beliefs, identifies the most-needed ch
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2026]
Interoceptive Attention as Dynamic Homeostatic Prioritization in a Foraging Agent
St John Grimbly, Nicolas Kuske, Evert A. Boonstra, Bruce A. Bassett, Charel van Hoof, Rowan Hodson, Benjamin Rosman, Ryan Smith, Mark Solms, Jonathan P. Shock
Biological systems must regulate competing needs under limited perceptual bandwidth, where sharpening one estimate costs the capacity to sharpen the others. Any fixed-budget system therefore has to decide where to allocate its perceptual precision. We study this in a foraging agent that must keep several bodily needs satisfied to survive, modelled with active inference. At each step it reads its own body-state beliefs, identifies the most-needed channel, and reallocates a fixed budget of interoceptive precision toward it, so that the same precision-shaped likelihood feeds both belief update and planning. In AffectWorld, a four-channel foraging gridworld, this selective allocation more than doubles learning-phase survival at matched budget against a uniform-precision agent (
0.414
vs
0.199
across 11 layouts,
n=32
seeds each, paired cluster-bootstrap
p≤
10
−4
). Two further results sharpen the mechanism. The benefit runs through planning as well as perception, since denying the shaped likelihood to the planner alone removes about half of it. It is also need-aligned, since aiming precision at the least-needed channel does worse than spreading it evenly. The attended channel additionally learns its own dynamics about twice as fast, and stays ahead even at matched observation count, a behavioural trace of the same precision routing, visible in learning speed, not survival.
Comments: Accepted at SAB 2026 (From Animals to Animats 18), forthcoming in the Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence proceedings. 20 pages, 11 numbered figures (12 graphics), 5 tables. The 12-page camera-ready paper is reproduced without alteration and followed by supplementary analyses that were not part of the proceedings paper. Code: this https URL
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.04232 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.04232v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04232
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: St John Grimbly [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 21:18:45 UTC (343 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)