CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 06, 2026

DeepInvert: Semi-Supervised Embedding Inversion Against Obfuscated Language Models

arXiv Security Archived Aug 06, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.04477v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cloud-based language model services routinely process prompts containing sensitive information. Obfuscation-based defenses---including ObfusLM, SentinelLMs, TextObfuscator, and DPNR---mitigate this risk by transforming prompt representations before transmission, offering a lightweight alternative to cryptographic solutions. We show these defenses provide far less protection than previously believed. We present DeepInvert, a semi-supervised embeddin

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 5 Aug 2026] DeepInvert: Semi-Supervised Embedding Inversion Against Obfuscated Language Models Zhicong Huang, Cheng Hong, Tao Wei Cloud-based language model services routinely process prompts containing sensitive information. Obfuscation-based defenses---including ObfusLM, SentinelLMs, TextObfuscator, and DPNR---mitigate this risk by transforming prompt representations before transmission, offering a lightweight alternative to cryptographic solutions. We show these defenses provide far less protection than previously believed. We present DeepInvert, a semi-supervised embedding inversion attack that recovers original tokens from obfuscated representations with higher accuracy than prior methods. The key insight is that unlabeled obfuscated embeddings retain exploitable semantic structure despite perturbation. DeepInvert combines supervised training on labeled shadow data with a novel unsupervised consistency objective over unlabeled target embeddings, alternating between the two via a mixed training pipeline. Defense-aware adaptations further extend the attack to diverse obfuscation mechanisms across encoder-based and autoregressive architectures. Experiments on nine defenses, five tasks, and four model architectures show that DeepInvert outperforms prior attacks on most defenses. Against ObfusLM, DeepInvert achieves 73.5\% top-1 token recovery versus 26.2\% for the previous best. Our results reveal a task-dependent tension: obfuscation schemes preserving enough signal for utility also retain sufficient structure for inversion, while schemes resisting inversion collapse utility. On simpler classification tasks, some DP-based defenses can maintain both. We call for a re-evaluation of this defense class. Comments: 20 pages Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.04477 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2608.04477v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04477 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Zhicong Huang [view email] [v1] Wed, 5 Aug 2026 06:02:51 UTC (726 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 06, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 06, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗