DeepInvert: Semi-Supervised Embedding Inversion Against Obfuscated Language Models
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 06, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.04477v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cloud-based language model services routinely process prompts containing sensitive information. Obfuscation-based defenses---including ObfusLM, SentinelLMs, TextObfuscator, and DPNR---mitigate this risk by transforming prompt representations before transmission, offering a lightweight alternative to cryptographic solutions. We show these defenses provide far less protection than previously believed. We present DeepInvert, a semi-supervised embeddin
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 5 Aug 2026]
DeepInvert: Semi-Supervised Embedding Inversion Against Obfuscated Language Models
Zhicong Huang, Cheng Hong, Tao Wei
Cloud-based language model services routinely process prompts containing sensitive information. Obfuscation-based defenses---including ObfusLM, SentinelLMs, TextObfuscator, and DPNR---mitigate this risk by transforming prompt representations before transmission, offering a lightweight alternative to cryptographic solutions. We show these defenses provide far less protection than previously believed.
We present DeepInvert, a semi-supervised embedding inversion attack that recovers original tokens from obfuscated representations with higher accuracy than prior methods. The key insight is that unlabeled obfuscated embeddings retain exploitable semantic structure despite perturbation. DeepInvert combines supervised training on labeled shadow data with a novel unsupervised consistency objective over unlabeled target embeddings, alternating between the two via a mixed training pipeline. Defense-aware adaptations further extend the attack to diverse obfuscation mechanisms across encoder-based and autoregressive architectures.
Experiments on nine defenses, five tasks, and four model architectures show that DeepInvert outperforms prior attacks on most defenses. Against ObfusLM, DeepInvert achieves 73.5\% top-1 token recovery versus 26.2\% for the previous best. Our results reveal a task-dependent tension: obfuscation schemes preserving enough signal for utility also retain sufficient structure for inversion, while schemes resisting inversion collapse utility. On simpler classification tasks, some DP-based defenses can maintain both. We call for a re-evaluation of this defense class.
Comments: 20 pages
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.04477 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.04477v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04477
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zhicong Huang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 5 Aug 2026 06:02:51 UTC (726 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)