CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 06, 2026

AgentAntibody: An Adaptive Immune System for Defending LLM Agents against Prompt Injection

arXiv Security Archived Aug 06, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.04053v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prompt injection remains a critical threat to LLM agents, yet existing defenses treat each task as a self-contained problem, independent of previous encounters. In practice, user requests are often underspecified: they describe the desired outcome without fully specifying acceptable behavior. An injection can exploit this ambiguity, causing the agent to complete the task in a way the user would reject. As the user's expectations become clearer thro

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 4 Aug 2026] AgentAntibody: An Adaptive Immune System for Defending LLM Agents against Prompt Injection Shihao Weng, Yang Feng, Xiaofei Xie, Jiongchi Yu Prompt injection remains a critical threat to LLM agents, yet existing defenses treat each task as a self-contained problem, independent of previous encounters. In practice, user requests are often underspecified: they describe the desired outcome without fully specifying acceptable behavior. An injection can exploit this ambiguity, causing the agent to complete the task in a way the user would reject. As the user's expectations become clearer through concrete cases, a defense should learn from each encounter and apply what it learns to the next. Inspired by adaptive immunity, we propose AgentAntibody, which equips LLM agents with a self-evolving immune system against prompt injection. AgentAntibody represents its evolving understanding of the user's security boundary as a persistent library of antibodies. At runtime, the library recognizes threats to this boundary and mounts corresponding immune responses. Across encounters, it evolves to strengthen the agent's immunity to future attacks. Extensive experiments across three benchmarks and four backbone LLMs show that, by learning the user's boundary through experience, AgentAntibody outperforms existing defenses in preventing harmful actions while preserving legitimate task completion, even when the harmful and legitimate actions are both compatible with the stated task. Comments: 7 pages Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.04053 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2608.04053v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04053 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Shihao Weng [view email] [v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:41:34 UTC (972 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 06, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 06, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗