AgentAntibody: An Adaptive Immune System for Defending LLM Agents against Prompt Injection
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 06, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.04053v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prompt injection remains a critical threat to LLM agents, yet existing defenses treat each task as a self-contained problem, independent of previous encounters. In practice, user requests are often underspecified: they describe the desired outcome without fully specifying acceptable behavior. An injection can exploit this ambiguity, causing the agent to complete the task in a way the user would reject. As the user's expectations become clearer thro
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2026]
AgentAntibody: An Adaptive Immune System for Defending LLM Agents against Prompt Injection
Shihao Weng, Yang Feng, Xiaofei Xie, Jiongchi Yu
Prompt injection remains a critical threat to LLM agents, yet existing defenses treat each task as a self-contained problem, independent of previous encounters. In practice, user requests are often underspecified: they describe the desired outcome without fully specifying acceptable behavior. An injection can exploit this ambiguity, causing the agent to complete the task in a way the user would reject. As the user's expectations become clearer through concrete cases, a defense should learn from each encounter and apply what it learns to the next. Inspired by adaptive immunity, we propose AgentAntibody, which equips LLM agents with a self-evolving immune system against prompt injection. AgentAntibody represents its evolving understanding of the user's security boundary as a persistent library of antibodies. At runtime, the library recognizes threats to this boundary and mounts corresponding immune responses. Across encounters, it evolves to strengthen the agent's immunity to future attacks. Extensive experiments across three benchmarks and four backbone LLMs show that, by learning the user's boundary through experience, AgentAntibody outperforms existing defenses in preventing harmful actions while preserving legitimate task completion, even when the harmful and legitimate actions are both compatible with the stated task.
Comments: 7 pages
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.04053 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.04053v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04053
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Shihao Weng [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:41:34 UTC (972 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)