CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 05, 2026

LoCA: Forward-Only LLM Tuning after One-Shot Calibration with Local Credit Assignment

arXiv AI Archived Aug 05, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.03020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parameter-efficient post-training reduces the number of trainable parameters, but still requires repeated end-to-end backpropagation through the frozen backbone. Every adaptation step therefore needs backward-capable hardware and must store or recompute activations. We ask whether this repeated backward chain can be replaced by a one-time calibration. We introduce Local Credit Assignment (LoCA), a two-stage method for small-shift adaptation. One pr

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 4 Aug 2026] LoCA: Forward-Only LLM Tuning after One-Shot Calibration with Local Credit Assignment Linhan Xia, Rui Liu, Zhaofeng Zhang, Yihao Wang, Binrui Shen, Shengxin Zhu Parameter-efficient post-training reduces the number of trainable parameters, but still requires repeated end-to-end backpropagation through the frozen backbone. Every adaptation step therefore needs backward-capable hardware and must store or recompute activations. We ask whether this repeated backward chain can be replaced by a one-time calibration. We introduce Local Credit Assignment (LoCA), a two-stage method for small-shift adaptation. One probe backward pass fits a low-rank map at each transformer block from the final prediction error to a local hidden-state correction. LoCA then reuses these maps to form blockwise regression targets from forward activations and fits low-rank adapters with closed-form ridge solves. No further backbone backward pass is required. We evaluate LoCA on five discriminative benchmarks with Qwen2.5 models from 0.5B to 14B. In 16 of 25 reported task--scale comparisons, LoCA yields lower evaluation cross-entropy than the corresponding LoRA run. Its measured full-run GPU peak, including calibration, is 26--29\% lower than LoRA's. After calibration, its CPU steady-state memory is 36--52\% lower and its per-pass time is 43--48\% lower. A shared scale-normalized candidate set is reused across all tested Qwen2.5 sizes and on SmolLM2-1.7B. LoCA thus amortizes global credit assignment into one calibration and enables later forward-only tuning when repeated backpropagation is impractical. The code associated with this paper is available \href{this https URL}{here}. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.03020 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2608.03020v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03020 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Linhan Xia [view email] [v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 02:06:43 UTC (269 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 05, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 05, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗