DHMark: Public-Key Watermarking for LLM-Generated Text via Diffie-Hellman-Guided Rejection Sampling
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 05, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.03093v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) watermarking provides an important mechanism for tracing the provenance of generated text. Existing statistical watermarks are often effective and robust, but most of them rely on private detection keys, which centralizes verification and complicates public auditing. Recent public or publicly verifiable watermarking schemes improve key management, yet many of them rely on exact recovery of embedded cryptographic strings,
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2026]
DHMark: Public-Key Watermarking for LLM-Generated Text via Diffie-Hellman-Guided Rejection Sampling
Haocheng Fu, Yuqi Qian, Luyao Wang, Yun Cao
Large language model (LLM) watermarking provides an important mechanism for tracing the provenance of generated text. Existing statistical watermarks are often effective and robust, but most of them rely on private detection keys, which centralizes verification and complicates public auditing. Recent public or publicly verifiable watermarking schemes improve key management, yet many of them rely on exact recovery of embedded cryptographic strings, making them fragile under token edits, truncation, copy-paste, and low-entropy generation. This paper introduces DHMark, a public-key watermarking framework for LLM-generated text. The key idea is to separate payload authorization from noisy textual evidence. An issuer signs a short registry payload bound to a public context, and the payload is expanded into many one-bit equations. During generation, a Diffie-Hellman-guided token-labeling interface assigns each candidate token a public equation vote, and the sampler softly or selectively promotes candidates whose votes agree with the authorized payload. During verification, third-party verifiers use public information to extract token votes, aggregate them into equation-level evidence, and score only signed registry records. This design avoids exact recovery of a long embedded signature and instead treats watermark detection as registry-aided statistical evidence aggregation. We formalize the public-verification setting, analyze label pseudorandomness, registry-backed soundness, and sampling distortion, and evaluate a prototype under truncation, substitution, copy-paste, wrong-context, and plain-generation attacks. In the default 32-bit configuration, DHMark maintains at least a 0.967 valid rate across eight edit conditions while yielding a 0.000 acceptance rate on three negative controls.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.03093 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.03093v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03093
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Haocheng Fu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 04:08:40 UTC (544 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)