CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 05, 2026

On the Performance of Malware Detection Classifiers Using Hardware Performance Counters

arXiv Security Archived Aug 05, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2608.02671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Malware detection using Hardware Performance Counters (HPC) has emerged as a promising solution to improve the security of computing systems as a complement to antivirus software. Hardware-based malware detectors (HMD) use Machine Learning (ML) classifiers to detect malicious application patterns. The inputs to ML classifiers are low-level performance features known as HPCs, hardware-related activity data collected from a processor at run time to p

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 2 Aug 2026] On the Performance of Malware Detection Classifiers Using Hardware Performance Counters Alireza Abolhasani Zeraatkar, Parnian Shabani Kamran, Inderpreet Kaur, Nagabindu Ramu, Tyler Sheaves, Hussain Al-Asaad Malware detection using Hardware Performance Counters (HPC) has emerged as a promising solution to improve the security of computing systems as a complement to antivirus software. Hardware-based malware detectors (HMD) use Machine Learning (ML) classifiers to detect malicious application patterns. The inputs to ML classifiers are low-level performance features known as HPCs, hardware-related activity data collected from a processor at run time to profile the low-level microarchitectural behavior of an application. This paper proposes malware detection using HPCs and machine learning classifiers and highlights the effectiveness of malware detection at run-time. We use ensemble learning techniques to improve the performance of the hardware-based malware detectors, which reduces the number of necessary micro-architectural events. This improves the processor's efficiency by eliminating the need to run an application several times since a processor can measure only 2 to 8 events at a cycle. We use 18 machine-learning models along with two ensemble learning methods to evaluate the malware detection performance, creating a total of 144 different configurations. The experimental results show that the ensemble learning-based malware detection with 2 HPCs using the ensemble technique outperforms standard classifiers with 8 HPCs by up to 10%. It also matches the performance of standard ML-based detectors that use 16 HPCs while requiring only 4 HPCs, thereby enabling effective run-time malware detection. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.02671 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2608.02671v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02671 Focus to learn more Journal reference: 2024 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets), IEEE, 2024 Submission history From: Alireza Abolhasani Zeraatkar [view email] [v1] Sun, 2 Aug 2026 14:28:54 UTC (19 KB) Access Paper: view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 05, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 05, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗