Multi-LLM Consensus Framework for Evaluating Banking-Sector NIDS Dataset Coverage of MITRE ATT&CK Techniques
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 04, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.00895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The systemic criticality of global banking networks has ren-dered them high-priority targets for advanced persistent threats, neces-sitating Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) whose operational effectiveness must extend beyond statistical accuracy. However, a signif-icant validation gap persists between experimental NIDS performance and real-world effectiveness: NIDS models that achieve high accuracy on standard benchmarks often fail in ope
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 1 Aug 2026]
Multi-LLM Consensus Framework for Evaluating Banking-Sector NIDS Dataset Coverage of MITRE ATT&CK Techniques
Sanjida Khanom, Sadia Afrin Khan, Adrita Rahman Tory, Md. Ahsan Habib, Khondokar Fida Hasan
The systemic criticality of global banking networks has ren-dered them high-priority targets for advanced persistent threats, neces-sitating Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) whose operational effectiveness must extend beyond statistical accuracy. However, a signif-icant validation gap persists between experimental NIDS performance and real-world effectiveness: NIDS models that achieve high accuracy on standard benchmarks often fail in operational banking environments because generic datasets lack sector-specific patterns, such as SWIFT and ATM-related intrusions, that characterize real financial threats. To address this, the paper investigates a sector-aware evaluation method-ology that systematically assesses how well existing NIDS benchmark datasets cover the attack behaviors most relevant to banking infrastruc-ture. The methodology maps documented adversary behaviors from the MITRE ATT&CK knowledge base to NIDS benchmarks while enforcing the realistic sensor limitations defined by NIST SP 800-94. Leveraging a multi-LLM consensus engine with four state-of-the-art models, we evalu-ated 210 banking-specific adversary techniques to derive a baseline of 68 network-observable behaviors for systematic coverage analysis. Results across five benchmark datasets demonstrate that UNSW-NB15 achieves the highest utility with an 82.2% weighted coverage score (though only 18.4% reflects direct, technique-level evidence), while CIC-DDoS2019 re-veals an 89.9% blind spot for core banking behaviors. These findings es-tablish a reproducible foundation for sector-aware NIDS evaluation and highlight the urgent need for banking-native datasets.
Comments: 17 pages
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.00895 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.00895v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00895
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Khondokar Fida Hasan [view email]
[v1] Sat, 1 Aug 2026 23:23:13 UTC (1,518 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)