Safety Invariants for Agents Orchestrating Irreversible State Transitions: A Four-Dimensional Formalism Evaluated on Public Ledgers
arXiv SecurityArchived Aug 04, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2608.00783v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous agents are increasingly asked to produce irreversible effects on external systems - transferring funds, writing to durable storage, actuating hardware. Existing agent frameworks (ReAct, Reflexion, MCP) optimize task success on benchmarks and give little attention to the safety of irreversible side-effects. We formalize one such setting, movement of value across public ledgers, as state transitions in a four-dimensional space indexed by (
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 1 Aug 2026]
Safety Invariants for Agents Orchestrating Irreversible State Transitions: A Four-Dimensional Formalism Evaluated on Public Ledgers
Zhaoming Yin
Autonomous agents are increasingly asked to produce irreversible effects on external systems - transferring funds, writing to durable storage, actuating hardware. Existing agent frameworks (ReAct, Reflexion, MCP) optimize task success on benchmarks and give little attention to the safety of irreversible side-effects. We formalize one such setting, movement of value across public ledgers, as state transitions in a four-dimensional space indexed by (wallet, chain, address, protocol), and use that formalism to state and prove a guarantee we call execution fidelity: under a fault model admitting planner mis-mapping, ambiguous outcomes, retries, at-least-once delivery, and delegated non-human callers, a session's realized effect on the ledger is either nothing at all or exactly the transition that was rendered to the user, exactly once. The theorem deliberately does not claim that the rendered transition matches the user's intent - no runtime layer can decide that - but it confines that unbounded question to a single predicate over a finite object, which is what makes a preview a sufficient control rather than a formality. Seven safety invariants, derived from the fidelity condition rather than enumerated from experience, discharge the guarantee. Empirically, on a controlled N=60 adversarial suite the stack lifts pass rate by ~74 percentage points over a naive-ReAct baseline on two write-aggressive backing models, but by only ~3 points on a write-cautious one - evidence that single-model evaluations of agent safety stacks are close to unfalsifiable. The system is deployed; 108 production write operations across 8 chains back the failure taxonomy. Although the evaluation setting is public ledgers, the formalism and invariants apply to any probabilistic agent acting on irreversible external state.
Comments: 29 pages, 8 figures, 7 tables
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
ACM classes: D.4.6; I.2.11; K.4.4
Cite as: arXiv:2608.00783 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.00783v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00783
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zhaoming Yin [view email]
[v1] Sat, 1 Aug 2026 17:29:42 UTC (44 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)