CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 03, 2026

Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds through Complementarity-Driven Iterative Collaboration

arXiv AI Archived Aug 03, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2607.29087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations. These heterogeneous boundaries pose a deployment challenge, but also create an opportunity: strategically coordinating multiple LLMs may unlock collective intelligence exceeding any single model. Existing approaches fix how models are combined in advance, overlooking the dynamic, state-depende

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 31 Jul 2026] Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds through Complementarity-Driven Iterative Collaboration Yanbin Fang, Xuan Wei, Wei Chen Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations. These heterogeneous boundaries pose a deployment challenge, but also create an opportunity: strategically coordinating multiple LLMs may unlock collective intelligence exceeding any single model. Existing approaches fix how models are combined in advance, overlooking the dynamic, state-dependent role of complementarity in complex problem solving. Drawing on the wisdom-of-crowds paradigm, we reconceptualize collective LLM intelligence as relay-style complementarity: a sequential process in which each successor model is selected to address the specific bottleneck identified in its predecessor's output. To operationalize this, we propose WILC (Wisdom Integration of LLM Crowds), a framework grounded in two design principles. First, iterative reflection-and-refinement establishes a state-preserving workflow through which models diagnose and refine prior outputs. Second, complementarity-driven model selection governs transitions via a dual-gate mechanism: prospective complementarity fit (PCF) identifies the worker most suited to the current bottleneck, while posterior complementarity gain (PCG) evaluates whether the selected transition improves the evolving solution. Experiments across four diverse benchmarks show that WILC outperforms existing approaches, including single-model self-refinement, ensemble methods, and query-routing methods. Under standardized pricing assumptions, WILC matches the average benchmark performance of GPT-5.2 at roughly 7 times lower estimated per-query cost, while facilitating data sovereignty through self-hosted deployment. This study extends wisdom-of-crowds theory from static aggregation to sequential AI complementarity and provides transferable design principles for multi-AI coordination. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2607.29087 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2607.29087v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29087 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Xuan Wei [view email] [v1] Fri, 31 Jul 2026 07:13:59 UTC (2,422 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 03, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 03, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗