CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Aug 03, 2026

A Generalized-Bayes Perspective on Counterfactual Explanations: Posterior-Based Decision-Making and Evaluation

arXiv AI Archived Aug 03, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2607.29077v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual explanations (CEs) enhance the interpretability of machine learning models by identifying the smallest change to an input required to obtain a desired output. Although CEs are conventionally formulated as a distance-minimization problem, the theoretical basis of this formulation has received limited attention. We show that a distance-minimization-based CE is mathematically equivalent to the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of a Gi

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 31 Jul 2026] A Generalized-Bayes Perspective on Counterfactual Explanations: Posterior-Based Decision-Making and Evaluation Keita Kinjo Counterfactual explanations (CEs) enhance the interpretability of machine learning models by identifying the smallest change to an input required to obtain a desired output. Although CEs are conventionally formulated as a distance-minimization problem, the theoretical basis of this formulation has received limited attention. We show that a distance-minimization-based CE is mathematically equivalent to the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of a Gibbs posterior within the generalized Bayes framework, specifically when a distance-based prior is used. We call this formulation the Distance-Prior Generalized Bayes CE (DP-GBCE). Building on this posterior perspective, we introduce two decision rules beyond MAP within a unified framework: a Bayes decision that minimizes expected decision loss and CVaR-CE, a risk-averse decision rule. We also propose an extension that uses Bayesian model weights to mix the posterior distributions of multiple models, thereby accounting for model multiplicity, where several models have comparable predictive performance. Finally, we define metrics for evaluating both individual CEs and the posterior distribution as a whole, and use experiments on simulated data and Google Trends data to quantify the trade-offs among the decision rules. Comments: 25 pages,5 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML) MSC classes: 62C10 ACM classes: I.2.6 Cite as: arXiv:2607.29077 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2607.29077v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29077 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Kinjo Keita PhD [view email] [v1] Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:56:22 UTC (252 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs stat stat.ML References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Aug 03, 2026
    Archived
    Aug 03, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗