A Generalized-Bayes Perspective on Counterfactual Explanations: Posterior-Based Decision-Making and Evaluation
arXiv AIArchived Aug 03, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2607.29077v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual explanations (CEs) enhance the interpretability of machine learning models by identifying the smallest change to an input required to obtain a desired output. Although CEs are conventionally formulated as a distance-minimization problem, the theoretical basis of this formulation has received limited attention. We show that a distance-minimization-based CE is mathematically equivalent to the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of a Gi
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 31 Jul 2026]
A Generalized-Bayes Perspective on Counterfactual Explanations: Posterior-Based Decision-Making and Evaluation
Keita Kinjo
Counterfactual explanations (CEs) enhance the interpretability of machine learning models by identifying the smallest change to an input required to obtain a desired output. Although CEs are conventionally formulated as a distance-minimization problem, the theoretical basis of this formulation has received limited attention. We show that a distance-minimization-based CE is mathematically equivalent to the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of a Gibbs posterior within the generalized Bayes framework, specifically when a distance-based prior is used. We call this formulation the Distance-Prior Generalized Bayes CE (DP-GBCE). Building on this posterior perspective, we introduce two decision rules beyond MAP within a unified framework: a Bayes decision that minimizes expected decision loss and CVaR-CE, a risk-averse decision rule. We also propose an extension that uses Bayesian model weights to mix the posterior distributions of multiple models, thereby accounting for model multiplicity, where several models have comparable predictive performance. Finally, we define metrics for evaluating both individual CEs and the posterior distribution as a whole, and use experiments on simulated data and Google Trends data to quantify the trade-offs among the decision rules.
Comments: 25 pages,5 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
MSC classes: 62C10
ACM classes: I.2.6
Cite as: arXiv:2607.29077 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.29077v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29077
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Kinjo Keita PhD [view email]
[v1] Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:56:22 UTC (252 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs
stat
stat.ML
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)