How Hard Does It Think? Analyzing Step-Aware Reasoning Energy in LLM Chain-of-Thought Trajectories
arXiv AIArchived Aug 03, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2607.28674v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding how computational effort is allocated across individual chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning steps remains an open challenge: existing interpretability methods rely on output-level signals or collapse processing depth into a single trajectory-level scalar, leaving step-wise effort opaque. We propose Step-Aware Reasoning Energy (SARE), a geometric framework that quantifies effort at the granularity of individual CoT steps via Centered Kern
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 28 Jul 2026]
How Hard Does It Think? Analyzing Step-Aware Reasoning Energy in LLM Chain-of-Thought Trajectories
Hui Wei, Junda Wu, Sheldon Yu, Sizhe Zhou, Yizhu Jiao, Ming Zhong, Bowen Jin, Tong Yu, Shijia Pan, Jiawei Han, Julian McAuley
Understanding how computational effort is allocated across individual chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning steps remains an open challenge: existing interpretability methods rely on output-level signals or collapse processing depth into a single trajectory-level scalar, leaving step-wise effort opaque. We propose Step-Aware Reasoning Energy (SARE), a geometric framework that quantifies effort at the granularity of individual CoT steps via Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) between Gram matrices of token hidden states across adjacent transformer layers, capturing inter-token relational structure without requiring eigenvector alignment or cluster correspondence. SARE further contextualizes this energy within reasoning's semantic progression by modeling CoT trajectories as transitions among latent semantic states. Across six reasoning benchmarks and three open-weight LLMs, we find that reasoning energy is highly non-uniform across step types, exhibiting phase-like transitions invisible to trajectory-level metrics; incorrect trajectories show systematically lower energy at critical reasoning junctions; and SARE-based features match or outperform output-based confidence baselines in most settings, indicating that internal geometric dynamics encode predictive information beyond surface-level signals.
Comments: 13 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.28674 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.28674v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.28674
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Hui Wei [view email]
[v1] Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:15:51 UTC (2,030 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)