Disclosure By Design: Identity Transparency as a Behavioural Property of Conversational AI Models
arXiv AIArchived Mar 19, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.16874v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As conversational AI systems become more realistic and widely deployed, users are increasingly uncertain about whether they are interacting with a human or an AI system. When AI identity is unclear, users may unwittingly share sensitive information, place unwarranted trust in AI-generated advice, or fall victim to AI-enabled fraud. More broadly, a persistent lack of transparency can erode trust in mediated communication. While regulations like th
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction
[Submitted on 27 Jan 2026]
Disclosure By Design: Identity Transparency as a Behavioural Property of Conversational AI Models
Anna Gausen, Sarenne Wallbridge, Hannah Rose Kirk, Jennifer Williams, Christopher Summerfield
As conversational AI systems become more realistic and widely deployed, users are increasingly uncertain about whether they are interacting with a human or an AI system. When AI identity is unclear, users may unwittingly share sensitive information, place unwarranted trust in AI-generated advice, or fall victim to AI-enabled fraud. More broadly, a persistent lack of transparency can erode trust in mediated communication. While regulations like the EU AI Act and California's BOT Act require AI systems to identify themselves, they provide limited guidance on reliable disclosure in real-time conversation. Existing transparency mechanisms also leave gaps: interface indicators can be omitted by deployers, and provenance tools require coordinated infrastructure and cannot provide reliable real-time verification.
We ask how conversational AI systems should maintain identity transparency as human-AI interactions become more ambiguous and diverse. We advocate for disclosure by design, where AI systems explicitly disclose their artificial identity when directly asked. Implemented as model behaviour, disclosure can persist across deployment contexts without relying on user interfaces, while preserving user agency to verify identity on demand without disrupting immersive uses like role-playing.
To assess current practice, we present the first multi-modal (text and voice) evaluation of disclosure behaviour in deployed systems across baseline, role-playing, and adversarial settings. We find that baseline disclosure rates are often high but drop substantially in role-play and can be suppressed under adversarial prompting. Importantly, disclosure rates vary significantly across providers and modalities, highlighting the fragility of current disclosure behaviour. We conclude with technical interventions to help developers embed disclosure as a fundamental property of conversational AI models.
Comments: 25 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
ACM classes: I.2.7; H.5.1
Cite as: arXiv:2603.16874 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2603.16874v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.16874
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Sarenne Wallbridge Dr [view email]
[v1] Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:31:37 UTC (461 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)