Informative Semi-Factuals for XAI: The Elaborated Explanations that People Prefer
arXiv AIArchived Mar 19, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.17534v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recently, in eXplainable AI (XAI), $\textit{even if}$ explanations -- so-called semi-factuals -- have emerged as a popular strategy that explains how a predicted outcome $\textit{can remain the same}$ even when certain input-features are altered. For example, in the commonly-used banking app scenario, a semi-factual explanation could inform customers about better options, other alternatives for their successful application, by saying "$\textit{Even
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 18 Mar 2026]
Informative Semi-Factuals for XAI: The Elaborated Explanations that People Prefer
Saugat Aryal, Mark T. Keane
Recently, in eXplainable AI (XAI), \textit{even if} explanations -- so-called semi-factuals -- have emerged as a popular strategy that explains how a predicted outcome \textit{can remain the same} even when certain input-features are altered. For example, in the commonly-used banking app scenario, a semi-factual explanation could inform customers about better options, other alternatives for their successful application, by saying "\textit{Even if} you asked for double the loan amount, you would still be accepted". Most semi-factuals XAI algorithms focus on finding maximal value-changes to a single key-feature that do \textit{not} alter the outcome (unlike counterfactual explanations that often find minimal value-changes to several features that alter the outcome). However, no current semi-factual method explains \textit{why} these extreme value-changes do not alter outcomes; for example, a more informative semi-factual could tell the customer that it is their good credit score that allows them to borrow double their requested loan. In this work, we advance a new algorithm -- the \textit{informative semi-factuals} (ISF) method -- that generates more elaborated explanations supplementing semi-factuals with information about additional \textit{hidden features} that influence an automated decision. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that this ISF method computes semi-factuals that are both informative and of high-quality on key metrics. Furthermore, a user study shows that people prefer these elaborated explanations over the simpler semi-factual explanations generated by current methods.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.17534 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.17534v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17534
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Saugat Aryal [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:42:46 UTC (3,194 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)