Proactive Knowledge Inquiry in Doctor-Patient Dialogue: Stateful Extraction, Belief Updating, and Path-Aware Action Planning
arXiv AIArchived Mar 19, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.17425v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most automated electronic medical record (EMR) pipelines remain output-oriented: they transcribe, extract, and summarize after the consultation, but they do not explicitly model what is already known, what is still missing, which uncertainty matters most, or what question or recommendation should come next. We formulate doctor-patient dialogue as a proactive knowledge-inquiry problem under partial observability. The proposed framework combines stat
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 18 Mar 2026]
Proactive Knowledge Inquiry in Doctor-Patient Dialogue: Stateful Extraction, Belief Updating, and Path-Aware Action Planning
Zhenhai Pan, Yan Liu, Jia You
Most automated electronic medical record (EMR) pipelines remain output-oriented: they transcribe, extract, and summarize after the consultation, but they do not explicitly model what is already known, what is still missing, which uncertainty matters most, or what question or recommendation should come next. We formulate doctor-patient dialogue as a proactive knowledge-inquiry problem under partial observability. The proposed framework combines stateful extraction, sequential belief updating, gap-aware state modeling, hybrid retrieval over objectified medical knowledge, and a POMDP-lite action planner. Instead of treating the EMR as the only target artifact, the framework treats documentation as the structured projection of an ongoing inquiry loop. To make the formulation concrete, we report a controlled pilot evaluation on ten standardized multi-turn dialogues together with a 300-query retrieval benchmark aggregated across dialogues. On this pilot protocol, the full framework reaches 83.3% coverage, 80.0% risk recall, 81.4% structural completeness, and lower redundancy than the chunk-only and template-heavy interactive baselines. These pilot results do not establish clinical generalization; rather, they suggest that proactive inquiry may be methodologically interesting under tightly controlled conditions and can be viewed as a conceptually appealing formulation worth further investigation for dialogue-based EMR generation. This work should be read as a pilot concept demonstration under a controlled simulated setting rather than as evidence of clinical deployment readiness. No implication of clinical deployment readiness, clinical safety, or real-world clinical utility should be inferred from this pilot protocol.
Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables. Pilot concept demonstration under a controlled simulated setting
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.17425 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.17425v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17425
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Pan Zhenhai [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 07:03:50 UTC (13 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)