CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 19, 2026

Proactive Knowledge Inquiry in Doctor-Patient Dialogue: Stateful Extraction, Belief Updating, and Path-Aware Action Planning

arXiv AI Archived Mar 19, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.17425v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most automated electronic medical record (EMR) pipelines remain output-oriented: they transcribe, extract, and summarize after the consultation, but they do not explicitly model what is already known, what is still missing, which uncertainty matters most, or what question or recommendation should come next. We formulate doctor-patient dialogue as a proactive knowledge-inquiry problem under partial observability. The proposed framework combines stat

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 18 Mar 2026] Proactive Knowledge Inquiry in Doctor-Patient Dialogue: Stateful Extraction, Belief Updating, and Path-Aware Action Planning Zhenhai Pan, Yan Liu, Jia You Most automated electronic medical record (EMR) pipelines remain output-oriented: they transcribe, extract, and summarize after the consultation, but they do not explicitly model what is already known, what is still missing, which uncertainty matters most, or what question or recommendation should come next. We formulate doctor-patient dialogue as a proactive knowledge-inquiry problem under partial observability. The proposed framework combines stateful extraction, sequential belief updating, gap-aware state modeling, hybrid retrieval over objectified medical knowledge, and a POMDP-lite action planner. Instead of treating the EMR as the only target artifact, the framework treats documentation as the structured projection of an ongoing inquiry loop. To make the formulation concrete, we report a controlled pilot evaluation on ten standardized multi-turn dialogues together with a 300-query retrieval benchmark aggregated across dialogues. On this pilot protocol, the full framework reaches 83.3% coverage, 80.0% risk recall, 81.4% structural completeness, and lower redundancy than the chunk-only and template-heavy interactive baselines. These pilot results do not establish clinical generalization; rather, they suggest that proactive inquiry may be methodologically interesting under tightly controlled conditions and can be viewed as a conceptually appealing formulation worth further investigation for dialogue-based EMR generation. This work should be read as a pilot concept demonstration under a controlled simulated setting rather than as evidence of clinical deployment readiness. No implication of clinical deployment readiness, clinical safety, or real-world clinical utility should be inferred from this pilot protocol. Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables. Pilot concept demonstration under a controlled simulated setting Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.17425 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2603.17425v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17425 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Pan Zhenhai [view email] [v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 07:03:50 UTC (13 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 19, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 19, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗