Draft-and-Prune: Improving the Reliability of Auto-formalization for Logical Reasoning
arXiv AIArchived Mar 19, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.17233v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Auto-formalization (AF) translates natural-language reasoning problems into solver-executable programs, enabling symbolic solvers to perform sound logical deduction. In practice, however, AF pipelines are currently brittle: programs may fail to execute, or execute but encode incorrect semantics. While prior work largely mitigates syntactic failures via repairs based on solver feedback, reducing semantics failures remains a major bottleneck. We prop
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 18 Mar 2026]
Draft-and-Prune: Improving the Reliability of Auto-formalization for Logical Reasoning
Zhiyu Ni, Zheng Liang, Liangcheng Song, Chenrui Cao, Xian Zhang, Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Pierluigi Nuzzo
Auto-formalization (AF) translates natural-language reasoning problems into solver-executable programs, enabling symbolic solvers to perform sound logical deduction. In practice, however, AF pipelines are currently brittle: programs may fail to execute, or execute but encode incorrect semantics. While prior work largely mitigates syntactic failures via repairs based on solver feedback, reducing semantics failures remains a major bottleneck. We propose Draft-and-Prune (D&P), an inference-time framework that improves AF-based logical reasoning via diversity and verification. D&P first drafts multiple natural-language plans and conditions program generation on them. It further prunes executable but contradictory or ambiguous formalizations, and aggregates predictions from surviving paths via majority voting. Across four representative benchmarks (AR-LSAT, ProofWriter, PrOntoQA, LogicalDeduction), D&P substantially strengthens AF-based reasoning without extra supervision. On AR-LSAT, in the AF-only setting, D&P achieves 78.43% accuracy with GPT-4 and 78.00% accuracy with GPT-4o, significantly outperforming the strongest AF baselines MAD-LOGIC and CLOVER. D&P then attains near-ceiling performance on the other benchmarks, including 100% on PrOntoQA and LogicalDeduction.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.17233 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.17233v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17233
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zhiyu Ni [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:35:14 UTC (361 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)