CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 19, 2026

Federated Computing as Code (FCaC): Sovereignty-aware Systems by Design

arXiv Security Archived Mar 19, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.17331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated computing (FC) enables collaborative computation such as machine learning, analytics, or data processing across distributed organizations keeping raw data local. Built on four architectural pillars, distributed data assets, federated services, standardized APIs, and decentralized services, FC supports sovereignty-preserving collaboration. However, federated systems spanning organizational and jurisdictional boundaries lack a portable mech

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 18 Mar 2026] Federated Computing as Code (FCaC): Sovereignty-aware Systems by Design Enzo Fenoglio, Philip Treleaven Federated computing (FC) enables collaborative computation such as machine learning, analytics, or data processing across distributed organizations keeping raw data local. Built on four architectural pillars, distributed data assets, federated services, standardized APIs, and decentralized services, FC supports sovereignty-preserving collaboration. However, federated systems spanning organizational and jurisdictional boundaries lack a portable mechanism for enforcing sovereignty-critical constraints. They often depend on runtime policy evaluation, shared trust infrastructure, or institutional agreements that introduce coordination overhead and provide limited cryptographic assurance. Federated Computing as Code (FCaC) is a declarative architecture that addresses this gap by compiling authority and delegation into cryptographically verifiable artifacts rather than relying on online policy interpretation. Boundary admission becomes a local verification step rather than a policy decision service. FCaC separates constitutional governance from procedural governance. Admission is validated locally at execution boundaries using proof-carrying capabilities, while stateful services may still implement post-admission controls such as ABAC, risk scoring, quotas, and workflow state. FCaC introduces Virtual Federated Platforms (VFPs), which combine Core, Business, and Governance contracts through a cryptographic trust chain: Key Your Organization (KYO), Envelope Capability Tokens (ECTs), and proof of possession (PoP). We demonstrate the approach in a proof-of-concept cross-silo federated learning workflow using MNIST as a surrogate workload to validate the admission mechanisms and release an open-source implementation showing envelope issuance, boundary verification, and envelope-triggered training. Comments: 22 pages, 5 figures Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2603.17331 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2603.17331v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17331 Focus to learn more Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6354918 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Enzo Fenoglio [view email] [v1] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 03:52:40 UTC (703 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 19, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 19, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗