CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Mar 19, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

arXiv Security Archived Mar 19, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.17123v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models increasingly power critical infrastructure from healthcare to finance, yet their vulnerability to adversarial manipulation threatens system integrity and user safety. Despite growing deployment, no comprehensive comparative security assessment exists across major LLM architectures, leaving organizations unable to quantify risk or select appropriately secure LLMs for sensitive applications. This research addresses this gap by e

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 17 Mar 2026] Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia Large Language Models increasingly power critical infrastructure from healthcare to finance, yet their vulnerability to adversarial manipulation threatens system integrity and user safety. Despite growing deployment, no comprehensive comparative security assessment exists across major LLM architectures, leaving organizations unable to quantify risk or select appropriately secure LLMs for sensitive applications. This research addresses this gap by establishing a standardized vulnerability assessment framework and developing a multi-layered defensive system to protect against identified threats. We systematically evaluate five widely-deployed LLM families GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Claude-3 Haiku, LLaMA-2-70B, and Gemini-2.5-pro against 10,000 adversarial prompts spanning six attack categories. Our assessment reveals critical security disparities, with vulnerability rates ranging from 11.9\% to 29.8\%, demonstrating that LLM capability does not correlate with security robustness. To mitigate these risks, we develop a production-ready defensive framework achieving 83\% average detection accuracy with only 5\% false positives. These results demonstrate that systematic security assessment combined with external defensive measures provides a viable path toward safer LLM deployment in production environments. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.17123 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2603.17123v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.17123 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Iman Vakilinia [view email] [v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 20:32:06 UTC (3,833 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Mar 19, 2026
    Archived
    Mar 19, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗