CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning

KidsNanny: A Two-Stage Multimodal Content Moderation Pipeline Integrating Visual Classification, Object Detection, OCR, and Contextual Reasoning for Child Safety

arXiv Security Archived Mar 18, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.16181v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present KidsNanny, a two-stage multimodal content moderation architecture for child safety. Stage 1 combines a vision transformer (ViT) with an object detector for visual screening (11.7 ms); outputs are routed as text not raw pixels to Stage 2, which applies OCR and a text based 7B language model for contextual reasoning (120 ms total pipeline). We evaluate on the UnsafeBench Sexual category (1,054 images) under two regimes: vision-only, isol

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition [Submitted on 17 Mar 2026] KidsNanny: A Two-Stage Multimodal Content Moderation Pipeline Integrating Visual Classification, Object Detection, OCR, and Contextual Reasoning for Child Safety Viraj Panchal, Tanmay Talsaniya, Parag Patel, Meet Patel We present KidsNanny, a two-stage multimodal content moderation architecture for child safety. Stage 1 combines a vision transformer (ViT) with an object detector for visual screening (11.7 ms); outputs are routed as text not raw pixels to Stage 2, which applies OCR and a text based 7B language model for contextual reasoning (120 ms total pipeline). We evaluate on the UnsafeBench Sexual category (1,054 images) under two regimes: vision-only, isolating Stage 1, and multimodal, evaluating the full Stage 1+2 pipeline. Stage 1 achieves 80.27% accuracy and 85.39% F1 at 11.7 ms; vision-only baselines range from 59.01% to 77.04% accuracy. The full pipeline achieves 81.40% accuracy and 86.16% F1 at 120 ms, compared to ShieldGemma-2 (64.80% accuracy, 1,136 ms) and LlavaGuard (80.36% accuracy, 4,138 ms). To evaluate text-awareness, we filter two subsets: a text+visual subset (257 images) and a text-only subset (44 images where safety depends primarily on embedded text). On text-only images, KidsNanny achieves 100% recall (25/25 positives; small sample) and 75.76% precision; ShieldGemma-2 achieves 84% recall and 60% precision at 1,136 ms. Results suggest that dedicated OCR-based reasoning may offer recall-precision advantages on text-embedded threats at lower latency, though the small text-only subset limits generalizability. By documenting this architecture and evaluation methodology, we aim to contribute to the broader research effort on efficient multimodal content moderation for child safety. Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures, 6 tables Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) ACM classes: I.4.9; I.2.7; K.4.1 Cite as: arXiv:2603.16181 [cs.CV]   (or arXiv:2603.16181v1 [cs.CV] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.16181 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Viraj Panchal [view email] [v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 07:00:43 UTC (359 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CV < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.CR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Archived
    Mar 18, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗