Detecting Sentiment Steering Attacks on RAG-enabled Large Language Models
arXiv SecurityArchived Mar 18, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2603.16342v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The proliferation of large-scale IoT networks has been both a blessing and a curse. Not only has it revolutionized the way organizations operate by increasing the efficiency of automated procedures, but it has also simplified our daily lives. However, while IoT networks have improved convenience and connectivity, they have also increased security risk due to unauthorized devices gaining access to these networks and exploiting existing weaknesses wi
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 17 Mar 2026]
Detecting Sentiment Steering Attacks on RAG-enabled Large Language Models
Isha Andrade, Shalaka S Mahadik, Mithun Mukherjee, Pranav M Pawar, Raja Muthalagu
The proliferation of large-scale IoT networks has been both a blessing and a curse. Not only has it revolutionized the way organizations operate by increasing the efficiency of automated procedures, but it has also simplified our daily lives. However, while IoT networks have improved convenience and connectivity, they have also increased security risk due to unauthorized devices gaining access to these networks and exploiting existing weaknesses with specific attack types. The research proposes two lightweight deep learning (DL)-based intelligent intrusion detection systems (IDS). to enhance the security of IoT networks: the proposed convolutional neural network (CNN)-based IDS and the proposed long short-term memory (LSTM)-based IDS. The research evaluated the performance of both intelligent IDSs based on DL using the CICIoT2023 dataset. DL-based intelligent IDSs successfully identify and classify various cyber threats using binary, grouped, and multi-class classification. The proposed CNN-based IDS achieves an accuracy of 99.34%, 99.02% and 98.6%, while the proposed LSTM-based IDS achieves an accuracy of 99.42%, 99.13%, and 98.68% for binary, grouped, and multi-class classification, respectively.
Comments: 6 pages, 7 figures
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.16342 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2603.16342v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.16342
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Pranav M Pawar Dr [view email]
[v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:18:47 UTC (1,737 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)