CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning

State-Dependent Safety Failures in Multi-Turn Language Model Interaction

arXiv Security Archived Mar 18, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2603.15684v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety alignment in large language models is typically evaluated under isolated queries, yet real-world use is inherently multi-turn. Although multi-turn jailbreaks are empirically effective, the structure of conversational safety failure remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we study safety failures from a state-space perspective and show that many multi-turn failures arise from structured contextual state evolution rather than isolated

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 15 Mar 2026] State-Dependent Safety Failures in Multi-Turn Language Model Interaction Pengcheng Li, Jie Zhang, Tianwei Zhang, Han Qiu, Zhang kejun, Weiming Zhang, Nenghai Yu, Wenbo Zhou Safety alignment in large language models is typically evaluated under isolated queries, yet real-world use is inherently multi-turn. Although multi-turn jailbreaks are empirically effective, the structure of conversational safety failure remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we study safety failures from a state-space perspective and show that many multi-turn failures arise from structured contextual state evolution rather than isolated prompt vulnerabilities. We introduce STAR, a state-oriented diagnostic framework that treats dialogue history as a state transition operator and enables controlled analysis of safety behavior along interaction trajectories. Rather than optimizing attack strength, STAR provides a principled probe of how aligned models traverse the safety boundary under autoregressive conditioning. Across multiple frontier language models, we find that systems that appear robust under static evaluation can undergo rapid and reproducible safety collapse under structured multi-turn interaction. Mechanistic analysis reveals monotonic drift away from refusal-related representations and abrupt phase transitions induced by role-conditioned context. Together, these findings motivate viewing language model safety as a dynamic, state-dependent process defined over conversational trajectories. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.15684 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2603.15684v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.15684 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Pengcheng Li [view email] [v1] Sun, 15 Mar 2026 12:13:01 UTC (1,824 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Archived
    Mar 18, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗