CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 29, 2026

Tandem Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

arXiv AI Archived Jun 29, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.28166v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved the reasoning capability of large language models, reaching expert or even superhuman performance in domains such as competition math. However, whether weaker agents and humans can actually harness this capability is far less certain, with RLVR documented to drift reasoning toward idiosyncratic patterns such as poor readability and language mixing. Tandem training is a

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 26 Jun 2026] Tandem Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Difan Jiao, Raghav Singhal, Robert West, Ashton Anderson Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved the reasoning capability of large language models, reaching expert or even superhuman performance in domains such as competition math. However, whether weaker agents and humans can actually harness this capability is far less certain, with RLVR documented to drift reasoning toward idiosyncratic patterns such as poor readability and language mixing. Tandem training is a recently introduced paradigm that targets this compatibility problem: a trained, stronger senior co-generates each rollout with a frozen, weaker junior, and the two are rewarded as a team, so the senior is pushed to reason in ways the junior can follow. Yet this paradigm has so far been demonstrated only in proof-of-concept settings, leaving open whether it scales to the long chains of thought of the modern RLVR pipeline. In this work, we propose Tandem Reinforcement Learning (TRL), which carries the tandem training paradigm into RLVR. In TRL, the senior and a frozen junior alternate stochastically to co-generate the reasoning, the resulting generation is rewarded, and the standard GRPO loss is applied to the senior. Training Qwen3-4B-Instruct on competition math, we find that TRL matches vanilla GRPO on solo reasoning capability while three properties emerge together from the same rollout structure: stronger handoff robustness with the junior, reduced distributional drift from the junior, and a chain-of-thought more legible to the junior. Our results demonstrate a promising route for RLVR with practical payoffs in multi-model communication and human compatibility. Comments: 21 pages,7 figures,8 tables Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.28166 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.28166v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.28166 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Difan Jiao [view email] [v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:00:35 UTC (6,140 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 29, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 29, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗