CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 29, 2026

Towards Reliable and Robust LLM Planning: Symbolic Feedback-Driven Iterative Self-Refinement Framework

arXiv AI Archived Jun 29, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.27757v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have attracted widespread attention from academia and industry, yet their deployment raises critical security concerns regarding robustness and reliability. Planning, a core component of intelligent behavior, remains challenging for LLMs, which often produce infeasible or incorrect solutions in long-horizon decision-making tasks due to inherent complexity. In this paper, we propose a symbolic feedback-driven iterative s

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 26 Jun 2026] Towards Reliable and Robust LLM Planning: Symbolic Feedback-Driven Iterative Self-Refinement Framework Jiajing Zhang, Jiamei Jiang, Chenyang Zhang, Feifei Mo, Linjing Li, Daniel Zeng Large language models (LLMs) have attracted widespread attention from academia and industry, yet their deployment raises critical security concerns regarding robustness and reliability. Planning, a core component of intelligent behavior, remains challenging for LLMs, which often produce infeasible or incorrect solutions in long-horizon decision-making tasks due to inherent complexity. In this paper, we propose a symbolic feedback-driven iterative self-refinement framework to enhance the robustness and reliability of LLMs in long-horizon planning. Specifically, a natural language prompting mechanism is introduced to map logical symbols into natural language descriptions, enabling LLMs to better capture task constraints and semantics. We further design a symbolic verifier that identifies errors and converts them into corrective instructions interpretable by the LLM, thereby guiding self-refinement. In addition, we leverage a plan recognizer to infer goal reachability, facilitating more effective guidance toward desired goals. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently improves both feasibility and correctness in long-horizon planning tasks. This highlights its effectiveness in enhancing the reliability of LLM-based planning and potential to enable more trustworthy AI systems. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.27757 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.27757v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27757 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jiajing Zhang [view email] [v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 06:24:33 UTC (902 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 29, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 29, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗