CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 29, 2026

AdvScan: Black-Box Adversarial Example Detection at Runtime through Power Analysis

arXiv Security Archived Jun 29, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.27704v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: TinyML models deployed on edge devices are increasingly adopted in safety/security-critical applications, making them a prime target for adversarial example (AE) attacks where inputs are modified to cause misclassifications. However, existing AE detection methods either require white-box model access, which is often unavailable in licensed black-box deployments, or rely on input pre-processing stages that add non-trivial latency and resource overhe

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 26 Jun 2026] AdvScan: Black-Box Adversarial Example Detection at Runtime through Power Analysis Robi Paul, Michael Zuzak TinyML models deployed on edge devices are increasingly adopted in safety/security-critical applications, making them a prime target for adversarial example (AE) attacks where inputs are modified to cause misclassifications. However, existing AE detection methods either require white-box model access, which is often unavailable in licensed black-box deployments, or rely on input pre-processing stages that add non-trivial latency and resource overhead, often exceeding what mission-critical applications can afford on their inference path. To address these challenges, we propose AdvScan, a runtime power analysis-based methodology for AE detection that operates in a black-box scenario while inducing minimal latency. AdvScan is based on the observation that AEs produce anomalous neuron activations, which in turn generate distinctive power-consumption signatures. The algorithm initially constructs a baseline distribution of power signatures from known benign inputs; then, at runtime, it applies a one-sample t-test to determine whether a test input's power signature significantly deviates from this baseline, thereby detecting AEs. We evaluated AdvScan using three adversarial example generation algorithms: Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD), and Carlini-Wagner (C&W), on three MLPerf Tiny benchmark models implemented on two target devices: the STM32F303RC (ARM Cortex-M4) and STM32L562RE (ARM Cortex-M33) microcontrollers. Across 318,400 total test inputs, AdvScan detects 99.984% of AEs with only 40 false negatives and zero false positives. These results demonstrate the viability of power-based AE detection for secure, accuracy-critical TinyML deployments in black-box environments. Comments: 15 pages, 10 figures. Published in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.27704 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.27704v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27704 Focus to learn more Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2026.3663053 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Robi Paul [view email] [v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 04:04:08 UTC (13,613 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 29, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 29, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗