AdvScan: Black-Box Adversarial Example Detection at Runtime through Power Analysis
arXiv SecurityArchived Jun 29, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.27704v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: TinyML models deployed on edge devices are increasingly adopted in safety/security-critical applications, making them a prime target for adversarial example (AE) attacks where inputs are modified to cause misclassifications. However, existing AE detection methods either require white-box model access, which is often unavailable in licensed black-box deployments, or rely on input pre-processing stages that add non-trivial latency and resource overhe
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 26 Jun 2026]
AdvScan: Black-Box Adversarial Example Detection at Runtime through Power Analysis
Robi Paul, Michael Zuzak
TinyML models deployed on edge devices are increasingly adopted in safety/security-critical applications, making them a prime target for adversarial example (AE) attacks where inputs are modified to cause misclassifications. However, existing AE detection methods either require white-box model access, which is often unavailable in licensed black-box deployments, or rely on input pre-processing stages that add non-trivial latency and resource overhead, often exceeding what mission-critical applications can afford on their inference path. To address these challenges, we propose AdvScan, a runtime power analysis-based methodology for AE detection that operates in a black-box scenario while inducing minimal latency. AdvScan is based on the observation that AEs produce anomalous neuron activations, which in turn generate distinctive power-consumption signatures. The algorithm initially constructs a baseline distribution of power signatures from known benign inputs; then, at runtime, it applies a one-sample t-test to determine whether a test input's power signature significantly deviates from this baseline, thereby detecting AEs. We evaluated AdvScan using three adversarial example generation algorithms: Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD), and Carlini-Wagner (C&W), on three MLPerf Tiny benchmark models implemented on two target devices: the STM32F303RC (ARM Cortex-M4) and STM32L562RE (ARM Cortex-M33) microcontrollers. Across 318,400 total test inputs, AdvScan detects 99.984% of AEs with only 40 false negatives and zero false positives. These results demonstrate the viability of power-based AE detection for secure, accuracy-critical TinyML deployments in black-box environments.
Comments: 15 pages, 10 figures. Published in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.27704 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.27704v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27704
Focus to learn more
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2026.3663053
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Robi Paul [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 04:04:08 UTC (13,613 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)