Detecting and Controlling Sycophancy with Cascading Linear Features
arXiv AIArchived Jun 26, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.26155v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpreting and controlling model behaviors through activation steering methods requires many pairs of contrastive samples that clearly exhibit desired or undesired behavior. These data pairs determine the degree to which interpretability frameworks can reliably detect model features responsible for a behavior, and therefore the ability to steer models toward or away from such behavior. In this work, we present an iterative data generation pipelin
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 23 Jun 2026]
Detecting and Controlling Sycophancy with Cascading Linear Features
Maty Bohacek, Rishub Jain, Nicholas Dufour, Thomas Leung, Chris Bregler, Roma Patel
Interpreting and controlling model behaviors through activation steering methods requires many pairs of contrastive samples that clearly exhibit desired or undesired behavior. These data pairs determine the degree to which interpretability frameworks can reliably detect model features responsible for a behavior, and therefore the ability to steer models toward or away from such behavior. In this work, we present an iterative data generation pipeline that isolates cascading linear features responsible for a behavior. Specifically, we show how moving beyond simple binary pairs of samples, and instead isolating samples that show degrees of features that scale linearly with behavior, allows for better disentanglement of features. We focus on detecting and steering away from sycophancy -- the tendency of language models to prioritize user validation. We demonstrate that sycophancy features discovered through cascading samples form linearly separable subspaces, and allow for selection of model activations that more clearly correspond to the desired behavior than baseline approaches. We also evaluate their ability to enable detection, deterministic scoring, and robust steering, and see that they either match or outperform LLM-as-a-judge and system prompting baselines while providing lower computational demand and more interpretability guarantees. Code & Data: this https URL
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.26155 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.26155v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.26155
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Maty Bohacek [view email]
[v1] Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:10:53 UTC (3,346 KB)
Access Paper:
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)