CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 26, 2026

ShareLock: A Stealthy Multi-Tool Threshold Poisoning Attack Against MCP

arXiv Security Archived Jun 26, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.27027v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the rapid evolution of LLM-driven agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open protocol bridging LLMs with external tools, has quickly become foundational to modern agent ecosystems. However, the expanding adoption of MCP has also introduced novel security concerns such as Tool Poisoning Attack (TPA), which exploit LLM-server interactions to inject malicious prompts. Existing poisoning schemes typically adopt a monolithic plaintext embedding

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 25 Jun 2026] ShareLock: A Stealthy Multi-Tool Threshold Poisoning Attack Against MCP Liwei Liu, Tianzhu Han, Zijian Liu, Zishu Dong, Na Ruan With the rapid evolution of LLM-driven agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open protocol bridging LLMs with external tools, has quickly become foundational to modern agent ecosystems. However, the expanding adoption of MCP has also introduced novel security concerns such as Tool Poisoning Attack (TPA), which exploit LLM-server interactions to inject malicious prompts. Existing poisoning schemes typically adopt a monolithic plaintext embedding paradigm, which fails to withstand manual inspection or automated detectors. Current research still lacks a systematic analysis on multi-tool poisoning, where multiple tools can be exploited cooperatively to disperse detection risk. In this paper, we introduce ShareLock, a multi-tool threshold poisoning framework that utilizes Shamir's threshold scheme to ensure exceptional stealth and fault tolerance. ShareLock distributes the malicious instruction as benign-looking secret shares across multiple tool descriptions, achieving both information-theoretic secrecy and attack robustness against moderate auditing. After a covert reconstruction trigger is planted during server update, the aggregated shares reconstruct the hidden instruction, resulting in critical breaches of system assets or private data. To evaluate the realistic threat of ShareLock, we constructed a comprehensive benchmark encompassing four multi-tool scenarios and conducted extensive experiments across mainstream LLMs on two distinct MCP clients. Our results demonstrate that ShareLock significantly outperforms existing single-tool poisoning strategies in tool description-based detection while maintaining an average attack success rate exceeding 90%. Comments: 16 pages, 12 figures Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ACM classes: I.2.11; C.2.2 Cite as: arXiv:2606.27027 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.27027v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27027 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Liwei Liu [view email] [v1] Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:35:28 UTC (1,265 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 26, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 26, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗