CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 25, 2026

Leaking Circuit Secrets: Gradient Leakage Attacks on Graph Neural Networks

arXiv Security Archived Jun 25, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.25589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As graph neural networks (GNNs) become standard tools for critical tasks in circuit design and analysis, their security and privacy risks require careful attention. Here, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of gradient leakage attacks (GLAs) on GNNs in circuit-design and hardware-security tasks, a practical threat that has been largely overlooked. We assess state-of-the-art (SOTA) GNNs, including GraphSAGE, GCN, GIN, and GAT, trained on

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Machine Learning [Submitted on 24 Jun 2026] Leaking Circuit Secrets: Gradient Leakage Attacks on Graph Neural Networks Rupesh Raj Karn, Johann Knechtel, Ozgur Sinanoglu As graph neural networks (GNNs) become standard tools for critical tasks in circuit design and analysis, their security and privacy risks require careful attention. Here, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of gradient leakage attacks (GLAs) on GNNs in circuit-design and hardware-security tasks, a practical threat that has been largely overlooked. We assess state-of-the-art (SOTA) GNNs, including GraphSAGE, GCN, GIN, and GAT, trained on standard netlist benchmarks (ISCAS'85, EPFL, and TrustHub), for their fundamental vulnerability to GLAs. We find that GLAs can expose sensitive information, such as gate types and distinctive properties of hardware Trojans, which may assist adversaries in analyzing logic locking schemes or evading Trojan detection mechanisms. Our analysis shows that these risks are influenced by architectural features, with attention mechanisms (GAT) exacerbating leakage, while injective aggregation (GIN) provides comparatively stronger resilience. We further evaluate several SOTA defense techniques, including differential privacy, gradient clipping, secure aggregation, model compression with quantization, and adversarial training. We find that these techniques improve resilience only in specific settings and can also compromise model performance. Overall, our work provides key insights toward privacy-preserving GNNs and highlights the need for more robust and efficient defenses. We release our full methodology and artifacts. Comments: 12 pages Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.25589 [cs.LG]   (or arXiv:2606.25589v1 [cs.LG] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.25589 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Rupesh Raj Karn [view email] [v1] Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:59:28 UTC (367 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.LG < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.CR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 25, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 25, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗