CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 19, 2026

From Efficiency to Leakage -- Privacy Backdoor in Federated Language Model Fine-Tuning

arXiv Security Archived Jun 19, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.20553v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables multiple parties to collaboratively fine-tune language models for domain-specific tasks without sharing raw data. Since full model fine-tuning is often prohibitively expensive for FL clients, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has become the de facto approach in practice, freezing the base model and training only a small set of adapters. In this paper, we show that a malicious parameter server can stealthily corr

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 18 Jun 2026] From Efficiency to Leakage -- Privacy Backdoor in Federated Language Model Fine-Tuning Shanghao Shi, Chaoyu Zhang, Heng Jin, Yang Xiao, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, William Yeoh, Ning Zhang, Y. Thomas Hou, Wenjing Lou Federated learning (FL) enables multiple parties to collaboratively fine-tune language models for domain-specific tasks without sharing raw data. Since full model fine-tuning is often prohibitively expensive for FL clients, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has become the de facto approach in practice, freezing the base model and training only a small set of adapters. In this paper, we show that a malicious parameter server can stealthily corrupt a PEFT adapter into a privacy backdoor that implicitly memorizes the client's training samples as isolated per-sample parameter updates stored in separate neurons, without degrading model utility. Concretely, our attack, NeuroImprint, assigns a dedicated memorization neuron to each training sample and constrains that each neuron is updated at most once along the local fine-tuning trajectory. This design mitigates both cross-sample collisions and cross-step mixing introduced by large local batches and stateful optimizers (e.g., Adam/AdamW) in language-model fine-tuning. After fine-tuning, the resulting isolated per-sample updates can be analytically inverted in closed form to recover text embeddings, which are then deterministically mapped back to token sequences. To understand the generality of our method, we implemented NeuroImprint on multiple language models (BERT, GPT-2, Qwen2, and Llama3.2) and evaluated it across four fine-tuning datasets spanning diverse domains. The results demonstrate that our attack can reconstruct 59% to 79% of all finetuning samples with high semantic fidelity. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.20553 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.20553v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.20553 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Shanghao Shi [view email] [v1] Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:58:25 UTC (667 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 19, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 19, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗