CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 17, 2026

Children Are Not the Enemy: Child-Fit Security as an Alternative to Bans and Surveillance

arXiv Security Archived Jun 17, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.17957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Digital technologies are now central to children's learning, play, communication, identity formation, and social participation. Yet dominant approaches to children's online safety often rely on containment mechanisms, including bans, age gates, parental controls, monitoring, and screen-time restrictions. These approaches can be useful in specific contexts, but they often frame child protection primarily as a problem of restricting access to systems

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 16 Jun 2026] Children Are Not the Enemy: Child-Fit Security as an Alternative to Bans and Surveillance Kopo M. Ramokapane, Rui Huan, Zaina Dkaidek, Awais Rashid Digital technologies are now central to children's learning, play, communication, identity formation, and social participation. Yet dominant approaches to children's online safety often rely on containment mechanisms, including bans, age gates, parental controls, monitoring, and screen-time restrictions. These approaches can be useful in specific contexts, but they often frame child protection primarily as a problem of restricting access to systems designed for adults. In this paper, we argue that this framing is inadequate for children's digital lives and insufficient as a security paradigm. We propose Child-fit security, a design paradigm in which technologies likely to be used by children treat a child as legitimate users, not attackers to be excluded, vulnerabilities to be patched, or risks to be managed. In this paradigm, children's wellbeing, development, privacy, safety, agency, and rights become core security requirements. This shifts the focus of protection from apps, accounts, and data to the child-system relationship, which means protecting both the child and their participation. We conceptualise child-fit security, contrast it with containment-oriented approaches, define its core principles, and discuss its implications for security design. We conclude by presenting a research agenda for making child-fit security operational. Comments: 14 pages, 2 figures, Paper Under review Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) ACM classes: K.4; H.5; K.6 Cite as: arXiv:2606.17957 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.17957v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.17957 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Kopo Marvin Ramokapane [view email] [v1] Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:09:56 UTC (159 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.CY cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 17, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 17, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗