Sorries Are Not the Hard Part: An Expert-Review Case Study of a Semi-Autonomous Formalization
arXiv AIArchived Jun 15, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.13925v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models can often close proof gaps in interactive theorem provers, but a verified theorem is not the same thing as a reusable library contribution. We study this distinction through a detailed case study: a semi-autonomous formalization of Grothendieck's vanishing theorem. The initial version compiles with no sorries, but an expert review found serious problems in definitions, theorem generality, file organization, and the API. We the
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 11 Jun 2026]
Sorries Are Not the Hard Part: An Expert-Review Case Study of a Semi-Autonomous Formalization
Vasily Ilin, Brian Nugent
Large language models can often close proof gaps in interactive theorem provers, but a verified theorem is not the same thing as a reusable library contribution. We study this distinction through a detailed case study: a semi-autonomous formalization of Grothendieck's vanishing theorem. The initial version compiles with no sorries, but an expert review found serious problems in definitions, theorem generality, file organization, and the API. We then ran a review-driven refactor and compression process and obtained a second expert review. The before-and-after comparison shows a sharp split: agents adapted well to local, mechanically checkable feedback, but remained weak at choosing definitions and designing APIs. We argue that autoformalization should be evaluated not only by closed sorries, but by whether the resulting formalization survives expert review.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Algebraic Geometry (math.AG)
MSC classes: 68V20, 68V15, 68V35, 68T07, 55N30
ACM classes: I.2.3; I.2.7; F.4.1
Cite as: arXiv:2606.13925 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.13925v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.13925
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Vasily Ilin [view email]
[v1] Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:33:50 UTC (658 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.AG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)