CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 15, 2026

REPOSE: Quantifying the Price of Security in Weakly-Hard Real-Time Cyber-Physical Systems

arXiv Security Archived Jun 15, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.14395v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In contemporary IoT edge devices with real-time requirements, security is primarily enforced through design-time parameters associated with security tasks, leading to mechanisms that operate in an \emph{opportunistic} manner. As a result, security checks are often performed as secondary operations. This approach can result in systems where no security tasks are executed due to high utilization by other tasks. An alternative approach taken in prior

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 12 Jun 2026] REPOSE: Quantifying the Price of Security in Weakly-Hard Real-Time Cyber-Physical Systems Vijay Banerjee, Monowar Hasan In contemporary IoT edge devices with real-time requirements, security is primarily enforced through design-time parameters associated with security tasks, leading to mechanisms that operate in an \emph{opportunistic} manner. As a result, security checks are often performed as secondary operations. This approach can result in systems where no security tasks are executed due to high utilization by other tasks. An alternative approach taken in prior work is to add security mechanisms to every task in the system, resulting in substantially lower performance than that of a system with no security. These approaches have resulted in an \emph{all-or-nothing} scenario for edge device security, motivating numerous studies on the safety-security trade-off in real-time cyber-physical systems (RT-CPS). This study introduces an analytical framework -- REPOSE -- for evaluating the security feasibility of real-time control systems at runtime. REPOSE is developed for \textit{weakly-hard} real-time control systems that facilitate a ``bounded trade-off'' between safety and security. In contrast to imposing additional (pessimistic) design-time overhead as considered in some real-time security literature, REPOSE performs security operations in both \textit{proactive} and \textit{reactive} manners based on the task's current behavior. Our evaluations show that REPOSE can effectively add security operations to RT-CPS with a feasibility overhead of 0.06\% at 80\% utilization, compared to a 29\% overhead observed in systems with hard constraints. Through a case study of a classic control system, we also demonstrate that REPOSE provides a robust framework to \textit{analyze and calculate} the safety-security tradeoff. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.14395 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.14395v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14395 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Vijay Banerjee [view email] [v1] Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:29:11 UTC (492 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 15, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 15, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗