CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 11, 2026

MoCA-Agent: A Market-of-Claims Code Agent for Financial and Numerical Reasoning

arXiv AI Archived Jun 11, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.11537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Financial and tabular question answering requires more than fluent reasoning: answers must be grounded in the exact facts, formulas, units, signs, and scales that support them. A single misread cell or incorrect operation can silently produce a plausible but wrong result. We introduce \textsc{MOCA-Agent}, a market-of-claims code agent that replaces free-form multi-agent debate with claim-level verification. The system decomposes each question into

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 10 Jun 2026] MoCA-Agent: A Market-of-Claims Code Agent for Financial and Numerical Reasoning Abdelrahman Abdallah, AbdelRahim A. Elmadany, Sameh Al Natour, Hasan Cavusoglu, Adam Jatowt, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed Financial and tabular question answering requires more than fluent reasoning: answers must be grounded in the exact facts, formulas, units, signs, and scales that support them. A single misread cell or incorrect operation can silently produce a plausible but wrong result. We introduce \textsc{MOCA-Agent}, a market-of-claims code agent that replaces free-form multi-agent debate with claim-level verification. The system decomposes each question into typed atomic claims, asks specialist trader agents to buy or sell those claims, clears their orders into confidence-weighted accept/reject decisions, and synthesizes an executable Python program from market-supported evidence. A code-aware verifier then checks the program for execution, structural consistency, and common financial reasoning errors, with at most one market-aware repair round. Across ten public benchmarks spanning financial numerical reasoning, general tabular reasoning, ESG question answering, and multimodal chart reasoning, \textsc{MOCA-Agent} achieves strong performance using a fixed Qwen3.6-27B backbone, including 78.3\% on FinQA, 76.0\% on FinanceMath, 71.2\% on MultiHiertt, 86.9\% on ESGenius, and 85.6\% average on FinChart-Bench. These results show that aggregating evidence at the level of atomic claims, rather than whole answers, improves robustness in high-stakes numerical reasoning.\footnote{The code and data are available: this https URL. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE) Cite as: arXiv:2606.11537 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.11537v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11537 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Abdelrahman E.M. Abdallah [view email] [v1] Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:45:39 UTC (936 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.CE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 11, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 11, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗