A complementary study on PlanGPT: Evaluation with defined Performance Metrics and comparison with a planner
arXiv AIArchived Jun 10, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.10489v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated Planning is a subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI) where the main objective is generating a sequence of actions, known as a plan, that helps us reach a goal state from an initial state. A planning problem is defined by a set of objects, an initial state and a desired goal state. The objective is to compute a plan that'll lead us from the inital state to the goal state. Programs that generate plans are called planners. In this paper, w
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 9 Jun 2026]
A complementary study on PlanGPT: Evaluation with defined Performance Metrics and comparison with a planner
Youssef Abdelkader, Humbert Fiorino, Damien Pellier
Automated Planning is a subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI) where the main objective is generating a sequence of actions, known as a plan, that helps us reach a goal state from an initial state. A planning problem is defined by a set of objects, an initial state and a desired goal state. The objective is to compute a plan that'll lead us from the inital state to the goal state. Programs that generate plans are called planners.
In this paper, we did a complementary study to the state-of-the-art LLM called PlanGPT which was released last year. We redid some experiments to verify whether planning with LLMs is \textbf{pertinent} and \textbf{worthwhile}. We also check whether the results obtained in the official PlanGPT paper for plan coverage were correct, and we also performed a more comprehensive study on PlanGPT's performance: in our paper PlanGPT's performance was evaluated using two metrics: Plan Cost and Plan Generation Time. The results of planGPT were compared to those produced by a traditional planner for the same plans and same metrics. We discovered that PlanGPT is no better than a Greedy search strategy.
Comments: 7 pages
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.10489 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.10489v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10489
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Damien Pellier [view email]
[v1] Tue, 9 Jun 2026 07:07:48 UTC (277 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)