Reasoning or Memorization? Direction-Aware Diversity Exploration in LLM Reinforcement Learning
arXiv AIArchived Jun 10, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.10346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning has become a key paradigm for eliciting reasoning abilities in large language models, where exploration is crucial for discovering effective solution trajectories. Existing exploration methods typically encourage diversity in semantic or gradient spaces, without distinguishing what drives this diversity. A trajectory may appear novel because it follows a new reasoning process, or because it varies memorized patterns and short
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 9 Jun 2026]
Reasoning or Memorization? Direction-Aware Diversity Exploration in LLM Reinforcement Learning
Jiangnan Xia, Yucheng Shi, Yu Yang, Kishan Panaganti, Zhenwen Liang, Ninghao Liu
Reinforcement learning has become a key paradigm for eliciting reasoning abilities in large language models, where exploration is crucial for discovering effective solution trajectories. Existing exploration methods typically encourage diversity in semantic or gradient spaces, without distinguishing what drives this diversity. A trajectory may appear novel because it follows a new reasoning process, or because it varies memorized patterns and shortcuts. Rewarding both cases equally may steer exploration toward memorization rather than genuine reasoning improvement. In this paper, we propose DiRL, a Direction-Aware Reinforcement Learning framework that anchors exploration to an internal reasoning-memorization direction of the policy. Specifically, DiRL extracts this direction from model representations, constructs direction-weighted gradient features to characterize rollout updates, and shapes rewards to amplify reasoning-aligned exploration while suppressing memorization-aligned variations. DiRL integrates seamlessly into standard Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Extensive experiments on mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of DiRL, showing significant improvements over various existing exploration methods.
Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
MSC classes: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution
Cite as: arXiv:2606.10346 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.10346v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10346
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jiangnan Xia [view email]
[v1] Tue, 9 Jun 2026 02:55:12 UTC (2,142 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)