Local Is Not a Sufficient Privacy Boundary: Governing OS-Integrated On-Device AI
arXiv SecurityArchived Jun 10, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.10173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems move into operating systems, privacy no longer turns only on whether a model runs locally. A local assistant may assemble email, calendar entries, files, screenshots, notifications, and app intents; retain embeddings or summaries; invoke tools; emit telemetry; or route difficult requests to cloud infrastructure. Local inference reduces some exposure, but it answers only one question: where computation occurs. It does not answer who ma
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 8 Jun 2026]
Local Is Not a Sufficient Privacy Boundary: Governing OS-Integrated On-Device AI
Jonghyun Chung, Sanket Badhe
As AI systems move into operating systems, privacy no longer turns only on whether a model runs locally. A local assistant may assemble email, calendar entries, files, screenshots, notifications, and app intents; retain embeddings or summaries; invoke tools; emit telemetry; or route difficult requests to cloud infrastructure. Local inference reduces some exposure, but it answers only one question: where computation occurs. It does not answer who may assemble context, what derived state persists, which actions are authorized, or how updates change the system's authority. We develop an OS-centered privacy framework for on-device AI that treats privacy as an institutional accountability problem rather than a deployment attribute. The framework specifies a threat model, a six-part privacy risk taxonomy, privacy-by-architecture controls, and a four-level audit rubric. We demonstrate the rubric through a documentation-bounded comparison of Apple Intelligence/Foundation Models, Android AICore/Gemini Nano, and Microsoft Recall. Meaningful privacy in on-device AI depends on constrained information flow, bounded authority, visible user control, and auditable governance across the operating-system lifecycle.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.10173 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.10173v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10173
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Jonghyun Chung [view email]
[v1] Mon, 8 Jun 2026 21:07:11 UTC (27 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)