CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 10, 2026

Local Is Not a Sufficient Privacy Boundary: Governing OS-Integrated On-Device AI

arXiv Security Archived Jun 10, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.10173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems move into operating systems, privacy no longer turns only on whether a model runs locally. A local assistant may assemble email, calendar entries, files, screenshots, notifications, and app intents; retain embeddings or summaries; invoke tools; emit telemetry; or route difficult requests to cloud infrastructure. Local inference reduces some exposure, but it answers only one question: where computation occurs. It does not answer who ma

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 8 Jun 2026] Local Is Not a Sufficient Privacy Boundary: Governing OS-Integrated On-Device AI Jonghyun Chung, Sanket Badhe As AI systems move into operating systems, privacy no longer turns only on whether a model runs locally. A local assistant may assemble email, calendar entries, files, screenshots, notifications, and app intents; retain embeddings or summaries; invoke tools; emit telemetry; or route difficult requests to cloud infrastructure. Local inference reduces some exposure, but it answers only one question: where computation occurs. It does not answer who may assemble context, what derived state persists, which actions are authorized, or how updates change the system's authority. We develop an OS-centered privacy framework for on-device AI that treats privacy as an institutional accountability problem rather than a deployment attribute. The framework specifies a threat model, a six-part privacy risk taxonomy, privacy-by-architecture controls, and a four-level audit rubric. We demonstrate the rubric through a documentation-bounded comparison of Apple Intelligence/Foundation Models, Android AICore/Gemini Nano, and Microsoft Recall. Meaningful privacy in on-device AI depends on constrained information flow, bounded authority, visible user control, and auditable governance across the operating-system lifecycle. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.10173 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.10173v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10173 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Jonghyun Chung [view email] [v1] Mon, 8 Jun 2026 21:07:11 UTC (27 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 10, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 10, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗