EditSR: Enhancing Neural Symbolic Regression via Edit-based Rectification
arXiv AIArchived Jun 09, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.07915v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural symbolic regression models improve inference efficiency by shifting structural search to pretraining, but their one-pass autoregressive decoding is prone to error accumulation, which may lead to generating structurally incorrect expressions, especially in complex expression generation scenarios. Existing rectification strategies can alleviate this issue, but they often depend on restarting global search, thereby weakening the efficiency adva
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 6 Jun 2026]
EditSR: Enhancing Neural Symbolic Regression via Edit-based Rectification
Da Li, Xinxin Li, Xingyu Cui, Jin Xu, Juan Zhang, Junping Yin
Neural symbolic regression models improve inference efficiency by shifting structural search to pretraining, but their one-pass autoregressive decoding is prone to error accumulation, which may lead to generating structurally incorrect expressions, especially in complex expression generation scenarios. Existing rectification strategies can alleviate this issue, but they often depend on restarting global search, thereby weakening the efficiency advantage of neural models, and remain susceptible to error accumulation. In this paper, we propose EditSR, a two-layer framework that combines a neural symbolic regression model in the first layer with an edit-based Rectifier in the second layer to achieve efficient prediction and post-hoc rectification. Instead of restarting the global search, we maintain rectification efficiency by pretraining the Rectifier. Specifically, we formulate the rectification process as a step-by-step state-transition chain starting from an incorrect expression, and develop a state-transition algorithm to construct supervised rectification chains for training the Rectifier. To ensure syntactic validity throughout rectification, each edit action is restricted to a syntactically valid space so that every edited expression remains parseable. In addition, because each edit decision is conditioned on the current state rather than the history, the Rectifier allows errors made in earlier steps to be rectified by subsequent edits, thereby reducing the risk of error accumulation. Extensive experiments and ablation studies show that EditSR substantially improves symbolic structure recovery with limited extra cost, with more pronounced gains on complex expressions, where one-pass autoregressive decoding is more susceptible to error accumulation.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.07915 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.07915v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07915
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Da Li [view email]
[v1] Sat, 6 Jun 2026 00:37:03 UTC (4,768 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)