CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 09, 2026

Collective Hallucination in Multi-Agent LLMs:Modeling and Defense

arXiv Security Archived Jun 09, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.07941v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) create heightened risks in multi-agent settings, where recursive agent interactions can propagate, reinforce, and amplify unsupported claims. This paper models hallucination as a system-level, time-evolving process across a network of interacting LLM agents, where nodes represent agents and edges encode information exchange. The proposed formulation captures how hallucinated claims diffuse through comm

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 6 Jun 2026] Collective Hallucination in Multi-Agent LLMs:Modeling and Defense Saeid Jamshidi Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) create heightened risks in multi-agent settings, where recursive agent interactions can propagate, reinforce, and amplify unsupported claims. This paper models hallucination as a system-level, time-evolving process across a network of interacting LLM agents, where nodes represent agents and edges encode information exchange. The proposed formulation captures how hallucinated claims diffuse through communication topologies, intensify under adversarial perturbations, and affect collective reliability across reasoning rounds. To suppress error propagation, we introduce an interaction-aware control method that combines confidence-weighted aggregation, adaptive impact regulation, external claim verification, and selective isolation of unreliable agents. Experiments on TruthfulQA and TriviaQA show that the proposed method reduces hallucination by up to 39.0% relative to undefended multi-agent reasoning, improves factual accuracy from 0.79 to 0.87, and increases semantic consistency from 0.75 to 0.84. Under adversarial conditions, the method limits hallucination amplification to 1.08, compared with 1.45 without adaptive control, maintaining stable collective behavior across recursive interaction rounds. These results indicate that hallucination in multi-agent LLM systems is governed by both individual model reliability and system-level interaction dynamics, including communication topology, confidence coupling, and recursive information flow. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.07941 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.07941v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07941 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Saeid Jamshidi [view email] [v1] Sat, 6 Jun 2026 02:04:03 UTC (10,063 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 09, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 09, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗