CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 09, 2026

Hallucination Cascade: Analyzing Error Propagation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

arXiv Security Archived Jun 09, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.07937v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) generate fluent text but remain vulnerable to hallucinations, producing unsupported, inconsistent, and factually incorrect claims. Most prior work treats hallucination as a static property of isolated outputs. In multi-agent LLM systems, however, responses are exchanged across agents, revised through sequential stages, and reused as context for later reasoning. Hallucination, therefore, becomes a dynamic process shaped

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Cryptography and Security [Submitted on 6 Jun 2026] Hallucination Cascade: Analyzing Error Propagation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Saeid Jamshidi, Arghavan Moradi Dakhel, Kawser Wazed Nafi, Foutse Khomh Large Language Models (LLMs) generate fluent text but remain vulnerable to hallucinations, producing unsupported, inconsistent, and factually incorrect claims. Most prior work treats hallucination as a static property of isolated outputs. In multi-agent LLM systems, however, responses are exchanged across agents, revised through sequential stages, and reused as context for later reasoning. Hallucination, therefore, becomes a dynamic process shaped by interaction history, cascade depth, and model heterogeneity. This paper analyzes hallucination dynamics in multi-agent LLM cascades by tracking claim-level factual inconsistencies across sequential agent interactions. We conduct 500 cascade experiments across 10 knowledge domains using GPT-5.3, DeepSeek-V3, and LLaMA-3-70B-Instruct, yielding 1,250 evaluated responses. Results show that deeper cascades reduce the normalized hallucination score from 0.422 at the first agent to 0.272 at the final agent in 3-agent chains, with an amplification factor of 0.644, indicating net attenuation. This reduction is accompanied by a decline in factual accuracy from 0.789 to 0.769, revealing a trade-off between hallucination suppression and factual preservation. Transition-level analysis shows that each agent-to-agent refinement reduces hallucination by an average of 0.072, with small but consistent losses in factual consistency and response quality. Model-level results reveal reliability-efficiency trade-offs: LLaMA-3-70B-Instruct achieves the lowest hallucination score, whereas GPT-5.3 provides faster generation with a higher hallucination rate. Domain-level analysis shows that hallucination varies with topic complexity, with lower scores in well-grounded scientific domains and higher scores in more abstract domains. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.07937 [cs.CR]   (or arXiv:2606.07937v1 [cs.CR] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07937 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Saeid Jamshidi [view email] [v1] Sat, 6 Jun 2026 01:56:55 UTC (5,182 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CR < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 09, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 09, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗