Front-to-Attractors: Modifying the Front-to-Front Heuristic in Bidirectional Search
arXiv AIArchived Jun 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.07047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heuristics play a central role in the performance of bidirectional search algorithms, which commonly rely on two main classes. Front-to-end (F2E) heuristics estimate the distance from a state s to the target of the search (the goal for forward search or the start for backward search). In contrast, front-to-front (F2F) heuristics estimate the distance from s to the opposite search frontier using a pairwise function h(s, s'), where s' ranges over fro
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2026]
Front-to-Attractors: Modifying the Front-to-Front Heuristic in Bidirectional Search
Alvin Zou, Muhammad Suhail Saleem, Maxim Likhachev
Heuristics play a central role in the performance of bidirectional search algorithms, which commonly rely on two main classes. Front-to-end (F2E) heuristics estimate the distance from a state s to the target of the search (the goal for forward search or the start for backward search). In contrast, front-to-front (F2F) heuristics estimate the distance from s to the opposite search frontier using a pairwise function h(s, s'), where s' ranges over frontier states. Although F2F heuristics are typically more informative and therefore reduce the number of node expansions, their reliance on extensive pairwise evaluations incurs substantial computational overhead. To address this limitation, we introduce a new heuristic class, front-to-attractors (F2A), that preserves much of the informativeness of F2F while dramatically reducing its computational cost. Rather than evaluating distances to all states on the opposite frontier, F2A estimates the distance from s to a small, dynamically maintained set of attractors in the opposite search direction. These attractors serve as a surrogate for the full frontier, enabling rich heuristic guidance at a fraction of the computational expense while maintaining the optimality guarantees offered by F2F. We evaluate F2A across multiple domains and show that it reduces the number of pairwise evaluations by up to 11.2x compared to F2F, while achieving 4.8x fewer node expansions than F2E on average.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.07047 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.07047v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07047
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Alvin Zou [view email]
[v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:46:27 UTC (577 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)