The Sim-to-Real Gap of Foundation Model Agents: A Unified MDP Perspective
arXiv AIArchived Jun 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.07017v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation model agents are increasingly deployed for real-world decision-making, but suffer from the sim-to-real gap. While robotics and classical control have mature frameworks to address this gap, the foundation model community is treating agent robustness as an entirely novel phenomenon. Our paper proposes formalizing the foundation model agent evaluation and training gap as a classical sim-to-real problem structured entirely around the four el
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2026]
The Sim-to-Real Gap of Foundation Model Agents: A Unified MDP Perspective
Xiaoou Liu, Tiejin Chen, Weibo Li, Xiyang Hu, Hua Wei
Foundation model agents are increasingly deployed for real-world decision-making, but suffer from the sim-to-real gap. While robotics and classical control have mature frameworks to address this gap, the foundation model community is treating agent robustness as an entirely novel phenomenon. Our paper proposes formalizing the foundation model agent evaluation and training gap as a classical sim-to-real problem structured entirely around the four elements of a Markov Decision Process, including Observation, Action, Transition, and Reward. In this paper, we set a comprehensive research agenda that translates classical discrepancies into the foundation model domain and advocates for adopting established solutions like domain randomization. We provide concrete examples, such as a multilingual tool calling to demonstrate how severe observation space gaps lead to operationally invalid actions despite correct semantic intent. Ultimately, this agenda aims to drive a paradigm shift, yielding a unified vocabulary and standardized stress test benchmarks to foster a new generation of highly trustworthy agents for reliable real-world applications.
Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables. Accepted by KDD 2026 Blue Sky Ideas Track
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)
MSC classes: 68T50, 68T37, 68Q32
ACM classes: I.2.7; I.2.6; I.2.4
Cite as: arXiv:2606.07017 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.07017v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07017
Focus to learn more
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3770855.3818660
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Hua Wei [view email]
[v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:00:25 UTC (3,109 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.ET
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)