CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 08, 2026

Exploring Agentic Tool-Calling Decisions via Uncertainty-Aligned Reinforcement Learning

arXiv AI Archived Jun 08, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.06976v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents often make suboptimal tool-use decisions, including unsupported tool invocation and hallucinated direct responses, which may accumulate errors throughout multi-step interactions. Existing approaches mainly improve these behaviors through inference-time correction or coarse-grained reward signals based on decision outcomes and structured checklists, leaving the uncertainty characteristics of agent decisions un

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence [Submitted on 5 Jun 2026] Exploring Agentic Tool-Calling Decisions via Uncertainty-Aligned Reinforcement Learning Yijin Zhou, Linqian Zeng, Xiaoya Lu, Wenyuan Xie, Dongrui Liu, Junchi Yan, Jing Shao Large language model (LLM)-based agents often make suboptimal tool-use decisions, including unsupported tool invocation and hallucinated direct responses, which may accumulate errors throughout multi-step interactions. Existing approaches mainly improve these behaviors through inference-time correction or coarse-grained reward signals based on decision outcomes and structured checklists, leaving the uncertainty characteristics of agent decisions underexplored. We observe that decision-oriented reinforcement learning tends to weaken the uncertainty separation between correct and incorrect actions, resulting in overconfident mistakes and weaker exploration signals. Therefore, we propose TRUST, which incorporates uncertainty quantification into reward design as a repulsive force for maintaining uncertainty separation, and labels lightweight key-turn annotations for unified post-training of multi-turn trajectories. Experimental results across diverse tool-use benchmarks show that TRUST consistently enhances both decision quality and agent performance while maintaining more reliable uncertainty estimates during optimization. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.06976 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.06976v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06976 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Yijin Zhou [view email] [v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 07:08:34 UTC (15,276 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv AI
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 08, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 08, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗