Declarative Skills for AI Agents in Knowledge-Grounded Tool-Use Workflows
arXiv AIArchived Jun 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.06923v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study orchestration mechanisms for tool-using AI agents in realistic customer-service workflows over an unstructured knowledge base. We argue that declarative agents -- AI agents equipped with natural-language skill files appended to the system prompt -- are an effective orchestration paradigm. Concretely, we compare (i) a DeclarativeAgent that reads three domain-specific skill files at inference time and decides its own control flow, (ii) an Im
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2026]
Declarative Skills for AI Agents in Knowledge-Grounded Tool-Use Workflows
M. Danish Lim, I. Danial Bin Sharudin, Wen Han Chen, Cedric Lim, Laura Wynter
We study orchestration mechanisms for tool-using AI agents in realistic customer-service workflows over an unstructured knowledge base. We argue that declarative agents -- AI agents equipped with natural-language skill files appended to the system prompt -- are an effective orchestration paradigm. Concretely, we compare (i) a DeclarativeAgent that reads three domain-specific skill files at inference time and decides its own control flow, (ii) an ImperativeAgent based on a programmatic state machine with explicit phases, and (iii) an unscaffolded baseline agent modeled after the \tau-Knowledge benchmark agent. Our ImperativeAgent is motivated by externalised-control inference as in Recursive Language Models and graph-based orchestration frameworks. We formalise the three agents as policy classes within a decentralised partially-observable Markov decision process and analyse their information-theoretic and structural properties; we then test the predicted differences empirically on five language models and two retrieval regimes. Our results show that retrieval quality is a dominant bottleneck for AI agents: when evidence is incomplete or skewed, all agents degrade substantially, and skill files cannot recover lost performance. Under high-quality retrieval, however, declarative skills consistently improve accuracy on procedural tasks and reduce orchestration errors, while the imperative state machine's brittleness does not reliably improve task success or compliance.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.06923 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.06923v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06923
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: L Wynter [view email]
[v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 05:38:51 UTC (23 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SE
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)