CyberIntel ⬡ News
★ Saved ◆ Cyber Reads
← Back ◬ AI & Machine Learning Jun 08, 2026

An Expanded Synthetic Conversation Dataset for Multi-Turn Smishing Detection

arXiv Security Archived Jun 08, 2026 ✓ Full text saved

arXiv:2606.06879v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Our prior work introduced COVA, a synthetically generated multi-turn conversational smishing dataset of 3,201 labeled conversations, establishing baseline detection benchmarks across eight models. While XGBoost with TF-IDF features achieved the best performance, with 72.5\% accuracy and 0.691 macro F1, transformer models underperformed, which was attributed to input truncation and insufficient training data. We present COVA-X, an expanded dataset

Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary · Claude Sonnet


    Computer Science > Computation and Language [Submitted on 5 Jun 2026] An Expanded Synthetic Conversation Dataset for Multi-Turn Smishing Detection Carl Lochstampfor, Ayan Roy Our prior work introduced COVA, a synthetically generated multi-turn conversational smishing dataset of 3,201 labeled conversations, establishing baseline detection benchmarks across eight models. While XGBoost with TF-IDF features achieved the best performance, with 72.5\% accuracy and 0.691 macro F1, transformer models underperformed, which was attributed to input truncation and insufficient training data. We present COVA-X, an expanded dataset of 10,985 conversations spanning eight elder-targeted scam categories, produced by an improved generation pipeline addressing contamination, label mismatch, stage-direction bleed, and prompt-design failures from the first iteration. Retraining all classifiers on the expanded dataset yields the central finding of this work: Longformer now surpasses XGBoost on all evaluation metrics, achieving 79.71\% accuracy and 0.7786 macro F1 compared with 78.43\% and 0.7563 for XGBoost. This directly confirms that transformer models require larger conversational corpora to realize their contextual advantages. We additionally document a quality life-cycle including a 12.7\times improvement in label correction rate, from 49.8\% to 3.9\%, an architectural intervention reducing virtual-kidnapping artifact rates from 67.1\% to 46.5\%, and a per-scam-type outcome analysis showing that scam categories modulate results in mechanism-consistent ways. A pre/post-cleanup sensitivity analysis confirms that dataset refinement recovers genuine label-relevant signal across all three classifier architectures. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2606.06879 [cs.CL]   (or arXiv:2606.06879v1 [cs.CL] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06879 Focus to learn more Submission history From: Ayan Roy [view email] [v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 03:46:36 UTC (28 KB) Access Paper: HTML (experimental) view license Current browse context: cs.CL < prev   |   next > new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.CR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Export BibTeX Citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Demos Related Papers About arXivLabs Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
    💬 Team Notes
    Article Info
    Source
    arXiv Security
    Category
    ◬ AI & Machine Learning
    Published
    Jun 08, 2026
    Archived
    Jun 08, 2026
    Full Text
    ✓ Saved locally
    Open Original ↗