Beyond the Canonical Protocol: Quantum Encrypted Cloning from Secret-Sharing Access Structures
arXiv SecurityArchived Jun 08, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.06552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum encrypted cloning shows that an unknown quantum state can be distributed into multiple encrypted copies without contradicting the no-cloning theorem: each copy is unusable on its own, but can be redeemed together with a suitable quantum key. Recent work has related canonical encrypted-cloning protocols to particular forms of quantum secret sharing. Here we take the converse perspective: instead of mapping a given encrypted-cloning protoco
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 4 Jun 2026]
Beyond the Canonical Protocol: Quantum Encrypted Cloning from Secret-Sharing Access Structures
Gabriele Gianini, Stelvio Cimato, Jianyi Lin, Omar Hasan, Corrado Mio, Ernesto Damiani
Quantum encrypted cloning shows that an unknown quantum state can be distributed into multiple encrypted copies without contradicting the no-cloning theorem: each copy is unusable on its own, but can be redeemed together with a suitable quantum key. Recent work has related canonical encrypted-cloning protocols to particular forms of quantum secret sharing. Here we take the converse perspective: instead of mapping a given encrypted-cloning protocol into QSS, we use QSS access structures as a design library from which encrypted-cloning schemes can be extracted. The criterion is access-structural. A QSS scheme supports a quantum encrypted-cloning structure whenever it contains a family of qualified sets with a non-qualified common intersection. The common subsystem is interpreted as the key, while the non-common parts are interpreted as encrypted clones relative to that key. Thus quantum encrypted cloning does not require a new notion of recoverability beyond QSS; what changes is the operational reading of QSS constituents as a mechanism for delayed and alternative redemption opportunities. This viewpoint separates redemption from perfect secrecy. Perfect QSS yields encrypted-cloning schemes with forbidden non-qualified subsystems, whereas ramp QSS naturally allows intermediate, partially informative non-redeeming subsystems. The resulting framework broadens quantum encrypted cloning from a specific protocol to a general access-structure primitive. We illustrate the extraction principle with threshold-like, ramp, hierarchical, and compartmented architectures, showing how encrypted clones may be symmetric or asymmetric, individual or composite, perfectly hidden or leaky. Equivalently, these constructions can be viewed as overlapping erasure-recovery regions of an isometric quantum code. This establishes secret sharing as a systematic design language for encrypted quantum redundancy.
Comments: 15 pages
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
MSC classes: 81P94, 94A60
ACM classes: E.3
Cite as: arXiv:2606.06552 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2606.06552v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06552
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Gabriele Gianini [view email]
[v1] Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:23:16 UTC (39 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR
References & Citations
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)