PSEBench: A Controllable and Verifiable Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Patient Safety Event Triage
arXiv AIArchived Jun 06, 2026✓ Full text saved
arXiv:2606.05463v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Patient safety event triage, determining whether a clinical event is reportable under jurisdiction-specific policy, is a high-stakes task typically performed manually by patient safety experts. Although LLMs may support this workflow, reliable evaluation is limited by the lack of benchmarks to capture evidence-grounded policy reasoning, proactive information seeking for incomplete reports, and principled abstention in irreducibly ambiguous cases. W
Full text archived locally
✦ AI Summary· Claude Sonnet
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]
PSEBench: A Controllable and Verifiable Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Patient Safety Event Triage
Keqi Han, Ryan Young, Annabel Strauss, Lindsey Hughes, Katharine M. Nesbitt, Nicole Schueler, Che Ngufor, Carl Yang, Yuan Xue, Zhijun Yin
Patient safety event triage, determining whether a clinical event is reportable under jurisdiction-specific policy, is a high-stakes task typically performed manually by patient safety experts. Although LLMs may support this workflow, reliable evaluation is limited by the lack of benchmarks to capture evidence-grounded policy reasoning, proactive information seeking for incomplete reports, and principled abstention in irreducibly ambiguous cases. We address this gap with a policy-grounded construction methodology centered on the clause card, a structured representation that factorizes regulatory text into auditable decision specifications. Combining clause cards with anchor-driven instantiation and closed-loop verification, our scalable pipeline produces narratives with by-construction ground truth and naturally supports generating missing information and uncertain variants. We instantiate this method on Minnesota's 29 Reportable Adverse Health Events, producing PSEBench, a 5,074-case benchmark with an agentic evaluation environment. Evaluation on 15 representative LLMs reveals consistent capability trends, demonstrates the benchmark's utility, and identifies actionable gaps toward reliable LLM-based patient safety event triage.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.05463 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2606.05463v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05463
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Keqi Han [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 21:41:39 UTC (723 KB)
Access Paper:
HTML (experimental)
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Export BibTeX Citation
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)